Home » Law (Page 35)
Snowfight with @_millymoo, @colmmu, @legalbizzle, @obotheclown + @lyndsaypye – merry xmas!
Very merry xmas, with these legal tweeps with whom I have been known to agree on occasion:
Book review: "Affect and legal education", edited by Paul Maharg and Caroline Maughan
“Affect and legal education: emotion in learning and teaching the law” edited by Paul Maharg and Caroline Maughan, Ashgate Publishing Limited
A link to the book is here; it is available on Amazon UK here.
It is a very major mistake to divorce cognition and emotion. Cognition and emotion are necessarily linked – that is how the human brain works, it is thought. It is impossible for the brain to formulate complicated higher order differential equations from scratch, and then solve them quickly, in response to the right questions. That’s why the million billion neurones of the human brain uses shortcuts to make decisions, often on incomplete information. Even more significantly, human-beings need to be behave with another with a socially competent manner, and to understand each other reasonably accurately. As a practical issue, it is dangerous to believe that you can predict future performance solely on the basis of complex higher cognition. In addition to emotion, the individual needs to be highly motivated. This sophisticated book on affect and legal eduction is the first to provide a comprehensive account of the importance of emotion and legal education, and makes important steps into understanding that the outcome of a successful education in terms of the aspirations of both the teacher and the student.
This book is well written. Even though the book is multi-authored, the style is consistent and coherent, and I found this book of enormous value across a diverse range of subjects. It is also immaculately evidenced, making it a robust and forceful argument for an agenda for a change in legal education. Maharg and Maughan demonstrate considerable leadership in considering the right topics. I feel also that the book is inherently innovative, in that it is likely that many individuals responding to this book, including student, teacher and lawyer, will do so in remarkably different ways, but much of the future strength of this book is the content generated by the users’ responses to the complex issues raised.
The book has a very clear structure. Part 1 considers affect, legal education and neuroscience, Part 2 considers affect and legal educators, and Part 3 considers affect and learning. The book collectively forces the reader to consider how the efficacy of education depends upon an individual’s reaction and interaction with it, and obliges the reader to consider what exactly the outcomes of education are (and whether they should matter). There are so many microstories told within this book which I adore. One for example is the account of FR Leavis, who was not appointed to a full lectureship at Cambridge until the age of 52, and was not even elevated to Reader until 64; in fact, he only obtained his Chair after he retired from Cambridge, going to the University of York. There are too many strands for me to cover them in a single book review, but I should like to mention two chapters in particular.
Chapter 9 is entitled, “What students care about, and why we should care” by Graham Ferris and Rebecca Huxley-Binns. My reaction to this chapter was one of enormous excitement, in fact. Ferris and Huxley-Binns advance a hypothesis that a curriculum design which ignores the motivation of students (perhaps in joining a caring profession), and notion of self-worth, will run into trouble. This simple idea is extremely elegant, and in fact in my view fully evidenced from neuropsychology. One’s perception of contentment will suffer if there is a mismatch between expectation and outcome, and so therefore it is essential to consider what motivates the student. The authors make reference to the seminal work of Frankfurt, and for me this hypothesis has at its roots Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. As a lawyer becomes more senior, compared to his or her stage as a fee-earner in a corporate firm, it may be that a lawyer becomes less concerned about paying off his mortgage, although that presumably will remain important. It may become more about whether he or she feels a difference is being made. The authors avoid the issue about what money is as a reinforcing factor, and in fact it was the view of my doctoral supervisor at Cambridge, the Head of Department there, that money is at best considered a “higher order motivating factor”.
Furthermore, I do not know whether Ferris and Huxley-Binns stumbled on distress as a relevant topic simply by seeing what goes wrong in legal education. However, the debate which they have introduced is directly relevant and important to modern cognitive neuroscience. The rejection of a mind-body separation is inherent to Damasio’s ‘somatic marker hypothesis’, and some cognitive neuroscientists now consider anxiety states as being where the human brain is not able to process body states adequately. Damasio’s work is directly relevant here as the ventromedial prefrontal cortex is considered to be crucial in producing an emotional state, using information about bodily states gained elsewhere in the cerebral cortex, and outputs through the autonomic nervous system in the spinal cord.
Therefore, in many ways, Ferris and Huxley-Binns’ argument is ahead of its time, and merits further consideration. The mind itself can produce a perception of abnormal physiological states, as demonstrated in the hugely complicated somatisation disorders. It matters to people that they care about things, and the authors argue that this must be taken account of legal education. This goes to the heart of all communication – actually asking what the other party wants. This error in legal training can be seen at all levels of legal education, and it is extremely useful that Ferris and Huxley-Binns requests that this should be confronted, not least because it maybe an affront to autonomy otherwise, a central tenet of ethics. I particularly liked the very clever argument, based on the historical work by Lepper and Greene (1975) and others, that rewards could in fact be demotivating (‘self-determination theory’), and the authors made their observations extremely relevant to the high motivational value of optional courses such as mooting. Therefore, in summary, the chapter is not only a sophisticated synthesis of neuroscience, philosophy, ethics and education from an academic perspective, it is also highly useful in the practitioner setting for the design of better course. The notion of ‘primum non nocere’ (at first do no harm) in assessment procedures is not lost on me. This, I feel, is a cautionary tale for those designing exit exams in the BPTC, or entrance exams such as the Bar Course Appraisal Test, proposed recently by the Bar Standards Board.
Chapter 13 is entitled, “Space, absence and silence: the intimate dimensions of legal learning” by Paul Maharg. I found this chapter challenging, extremely intelligent and delightful. In this chapter, Paul describes how spaces are formed, the meanings of space and what uses space can be put to, potentially, amongst other subplots. I feel the beauty of this chapter is in fact in the neuroscience which is not discussed. Firstly, it is now known that object and space perception happens in two distinct streams in the human brain, and it is thought that part of the reason why humans have so many neurones is that their brains participate in what is commonly known as ‘the binding problem‘. In other words, the brain, somewhere and somehow, produces a combined perception of the outside world, and this is somehow linked to the emotional and motivational state of the individual. Hence the discussion of how you listen to John Cage’s 4′ 33″ sensibly arises.
Secondly, but more importantly, it is the acknowledgement that group decision-making is intrinsically different from the sum of the parts of individual decision-making that is potentially extremely fruitful; another gestalt phenomenon. This helps one to understand the critical importance of working in teams, often cited as important in the corporate legal culture, as to how decisions are arrived at in terms of the logic as well as the social interaction between the participants. The second case study on communication, space and emotion is therefore extremely rich. Its relevance to students in law schools, for example in doing the GDL or LPC, is immediately obvious; it is also easy to see how corporate teams may function or malfunction in the context of high-end transactions; or it can be used to understand why the social brains of jury members collectively return one verdict rather than another.
To conclude, I strongly recommend this book, if you are a law student, teacher, lawyer or other member of society. The complex concepts are sufficiently well explained that any reasonable person should be able to understand them, and the book is important for three huge reasons. It is carefully researched, and is an articulate picture of various interdiscipinary strands connecting affect, emotion and legal education. Secondly, if the right questions are asked, it will take the quality of legal education (and its assessment) much further, as well as the work of those in academic or practitioner circles. Thirdly, it is way ahead of its time.
References
Lepper, M, Greene, D. (1975) Turning play into work: effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Research 31: 479-86.
Christmas Blog Cabin
This is my review of what I have found interesting in the law (and related) blogosphere. It’s been an explosive time for legal bloggers, and I hope that this blogpost is a true reflection of a part of what’s currently exciting at the moment. I strongly encourage you to look further at these blogs, for example while enjoying sherry, roast turkey or chicken and chestnuts over a log fire. We do not have a log fire in the log cabin for ‘elf and safety reasons.
Krish recently had a piece in the Guardian, also posted on his blog here. It’s particularly pertinent for me as I probably will resume my hunt for a good training contract next year. In the meantime, I will do some vacation scheme placements. Actually, given that I am not panicking about training contracts now, I feel a weight has been lifted from my mind, and I can actually begin to enjoy my life again. I found applying for a training contract very nauseating this year, especially since one top firm failed to implement my reasonable adjustments the first time around and wasted a fortnight of my time before not calling me for interview, and another simply did not bother to write to me at all as to whether I’d be coming for interview or not. I therefore have a contempt for the recruitment process, and feel with such behaviour I am better off enjoying my study of the LPC which begins at the BPP Law School on January 3rd 2012.
In the face of such impressive ineptitude, I have found solace in the substantive issues of the law. I believe strongly that the law should be necessary, balanced and proportionate, and I feel that the police and the criminal justice system should be there to solve the problems of society not to create them. Natasha Philips mentioned her ‘Researching Reform’ activities concerning the London riots in a quick blogpost. The reader’s comment demonstrates graphically how the balance must be struck correctly, for the public to have faith in the reputation of the criminal justice system. The legal doctrine of proportionality is a pervasive one throughout English and European law.
Will Van Zwanenberg is a student at the Bar, and his blog ‘Propping up the Bar’ is a very elegantly presented explanation of critical issues for barristers, including of course human rights. Will took a fascinating look recently at the eviction at Dale Farm in a very readable critical analysis. Will felt that the eviction of travellers from Dale Farm in Essex raised the question of whether Basildon Council’s actions will be a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, as directly applied in the UK via The Human Rights Act 1998.
The thing about the legal blogs is that they make the law come to life in a way that the GDL, LPC or LLM do not seem able to. For example, a compulsory component of the LPC is Business Law Practice, and towards the end students are guided through insolvency law as it happens in England. In an amusing but highly educational way, the Legal Bizzle has been charting the events leading to the ultimate administration of the Santa Claus Group (fictional). Legal Bizzle’s blogs are exceptional, and I look forward to coming back to some from the ‘archives’ in the next few months.
If the last few weeks are anything to go by, 2012 should be a sensational year for legal blogs here in the UK!
The LegalAware Training Contract Applicant Of The Year Award Competition 2011
It is with great It is with pleasure that @legalaware and @tc_applications announce the first ever “Training Contract Applicant Of The Year Award” for 2011. Modelled on the BBC Sports Personality of the Year Award #SPOTY, the winner will be:
Training Contract Applicant Of The Year
Next year, if there is a sufficient number of entries, prizes will also be awarded for:
Best International Student Entry
Best Legal Education Team
Best Newcomer
Anyone can in fact enter this competition. It’s only for fun – you could be a lawyer, law teacher, law student, legal recruiter, or none of the above.
Unlike most ‘marking matrices’ commonly used by corporate law firm HR specialists, each question will be marked on the following basis:
Spelling and grammar 5
Relevance 5
Humour 10
Interest 10
Each question will be double-marked. All competition entries should be through a valid e-mail address, although entries can be anonymous. If you work for a law firm, you must never give your real name or firm details. Answers should be emailed to correspondence@lasmeetings.org
There is a word limit of 100 words per question. You may decide that you wish to answer in much fewer words. In the event of a tie, a winner will be selected at random.
This year’s questions are as follows.
1. Describe an example of team in which you have taken part. What did you learn from this experience?
2. Describe an example of where you have demonstrated commercial awareness.
It’s important to realise that this is a spoof of online training contract application forms. Therefore the panel is looking for comical examples you’d never put in a real application!
The prize will be the prestigious award at a prestigious awards ceremony at a prestigious hotel in London, sometime in the future. The best answers will be published, with the permission of the contestant, in a blogpost in early 2012.
Deadline: January 3rd 2012.
Best of luck!
Annual Graham Turnbull essay competition on alternatives to imprisonment
Link: here
Law students, trainee solicitors, pupil barristers and junior lawyers are invited to enter the Law Society’s annual Graham Turnbull essay competition. This year’s essay title is: ‘In the light of the growing prison population should we look for alternatives to imprisonment?’ The deadline for entries is Friday 23 March 2012.
This is a very important, topical subject. I recently posted on a closely-related issue:
It is impossible to half-believe in rehabilitation
If you update all apps on your ipad and the thing freezes this is what I did
By the way, I am not asking you ‘to do this at home’. On my #ipad, the App Store advised me to update all 18 of my apps. I waited for about an hour, and nothing happened apart from all of them saying ‘waiting’, and I then found out from the iStore on my MacBook Air to which it’s synchronised that I had no available downloads. So what I did, and this works because I regularly synchronise my apps with my laptop, was to delete all the apps and re-install them (by resynchronising). The only fiddly bit was remembering to upload all my pdfs, but actually this was a good thing as this time I only uploaded the ones i wanted to.
I tweet here by the way – please follow if you’re remotely interested in issues to do with English or international law: @legalaware.
Grad Diary are looking for interviews about experiences at corporate firms
Joseph from Grad Diary is looking for anyone who has undertaken a training contract/internship/job at any banking/law/accountancy firm that appears on the Grad Diary website. You can follow Grad Diary on Twitter.
‘Grad Diary’ has sections on application deadlines, a company director, ‘insider interviews’, ‘a CV Clinic’, professional tips and a dynamic forum. The information given about them on their website reads as follows:
Grad Diary has been set up by its two founders with the goal of making job-hunting easier for UK graduates.
At the beginning of 2010 we conducted a detailed survey of students across university campuses in the UK in order to find out what information they wanted to know on the companies that they were applying for. With this information to hand we set out to build the most comprehensive and detailed database of information on over 800 graduate recruiters in the UK that were mentioned by name in our student survey.
On completion of the database we then went back those same students and from the follow on research we collected set about building Grad Diary, a website that would focus on being easy to navigate, up-to date, impartial and present information clearly.
Suggestions for interviews should be sent directly to joseph@graddiary.com. Joseph will then be able to explain the details or conditions concerning the interview.
This article appears out of the goodwill of LegalAware, and there is no financial relationship between GradDiary and LegalAware (nor with BPP).
Will opposites attract?
I am posting this following a recent tweet this afternoon. Incidentally, my article got a very hostile reception the first time around, Sundeep and Neil!
Lawyers in training often become bewildered as to how parts of their course ultimately gel together. This possibly contributes to their uncertainty in choosing which part of the law to specialise in. For example, how on earth does constitutional law, including the rule of law and human rights, relate to the different specialisms of law, such as immigration or housing? And what have they got to do with the big powerhouse corporate law firms, if anything?
A surprising fusion of these ingredients could hold the key to solving a different problem that has been vexing English and Welsh law for several decades, at least. That is, the issue of what to do about the provision of legal aid.
A community law centre, where the lawyer might examine a sensitive landlord-tenant dispute, may seem ‘worlds-apart’ from the work of a corporate lawyer, who may be advising on a multi-billion-pound, headline-grabbing deal. However, it is possible that these circles might mix more in future, due to the current circumstances.
Access to the law: back to the basic constitutional law
One of the very first things that law students focus on in their constitutional law courses is the ‘rule of law’. Indeed, the rule of law underpins the work of both ‘divisions’ of lawyers: the barristers and the solicitors.
In 1977, the influential political theorist Joseph Raz identified several principles that may be associated with the ‘rule of law’ in some (but not all) societies. Some of Raz’s principles include the fact that the courts should be accessible, i.e. no man should be denied justice, and that the principles of natural justice should be observed, particularly those concerning the right to a fair hearing.
And what of the actual reality of today, in England and Wales?
“The Government strongly believes that access to justice is a hallmark of a civilised society. The proposals set out in this consultation paper [on the reform of legal aid] represent a radical, wide-ranging and ambitious programme of reform which aims to ensure that legal aid is targeted to those who need it most, for the most serious cases in which legal advice or representation is justified.”
‘A brief history of legal aid’
Legal aid in England and Wales was originally established by the Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949, with the aim of providing equality of access and the right to representation before the law. The scope of legal matters covered in 1949 was very tightly drawn.
However, today legal aid in England and Wales costs the taxpayer £2bn a year – a higher per capita spend than anywhere else in the world. It is argued that the current scheme is available for a too wide a range of issues, including some which should not require any legal expertise to resolve. The provision of legal aid is now governed by the Access to Justice Act 1999 and supplementary legislation.
The possible effect of the proposed legal aid reforms
Many civil cases will no longer be eligible for legal aid, and fees paid in civil and family cases will be cut by 10% across the board, according to Ministry of Justice plans set out in the consultation paper, “Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales”, released in November 2010.
The UK government has estimated that, under the plans, £350m will be saved from the Ministry of Justice’s budget by 2014/15, if its proposals are implemented in full.
Ken Clarke QC MP, the Secretary for State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, has said in an interview that,
‘I believe that the taxpayer should continue to provide legal aid to those who need it most and for serious issues. But the current system can encourage lengthy, acrimonious and sometimes unnecessary court proceedings, at taxpayers’ expense, which may not always ensure the best result for those involved. The proposals I have outlined suggest clear tough choices to ensure access to public funding in those cases that really require it, the protection of the most vulnerable in society and the efficient performance of the justice system.’
Reaction from the solicitors
The cut in legal aid may offend the rule of law. For example, the Law Society Chief Executive, Desmond Hudson, has warned that:
‘If the government persists with these proposals, it would represent a sharp break from the long-standing bipartisan consensus that effective access to justice is essential to underpin the rule of law. Legal aid clients are some of the most vulnerable in society and good legal representation where required is essential if they are to obtain justice. The Society will now consider the green paper in detail.’
The effect on the high street – the community law centres
‘Law Centres’ employ solicitors and case-workers who specialise in debt, discrimination, housing, employment, welfare benefit, community care, mental health law, and immigration and asylum law. Their initiatives are truly inspirational.
In an open letter dated October 2010, Julie Bishop, Director of the Law Centres Federation, provides a very interesting description of the impact that the financial recession – a possible driver in the need to cut costs in legal aid services – has had on the high street legal services:
“We serve 120,000 clients every year. The recession is hitting our clients hard. Already, the Employment Tribunals Service has recorded an increase from 10,800 to 19,000 in the number of cases related to unfair dismissal over the past year [October 2009-10]. ACAS has recorded a 13% increase in enquiries for conciliation services. Law Centres have experienced a 30% increase in clients assisted with employment and discrimination cases.”
An example of where the Law Centres have made a substantial impact is in Brent. Brent Community Law Centre stated that the cuts to legal aid will leave two options for those in poverty on Jobseeker’s Allowance: “a move from poverty to extreme poverty, or possession or eviction if they do not pay their rent.”
They cite that a single person living in a one-bed flat paying £180 per week will have to contribute £18 to the rent out of a weekly income of £65.45, leaving £47.45 for all other expenses including fuel. A separate (but linked issue) which compounds vulnerability is the proposed capping of housing benefit. It is estimated that this will cost claimants in Brent an average of £8,817,844 per year. This loss is to be shared among 1,988 claimants. If their rents are not reduced, they will have to pay £4,436 per household out of their own income. Currently, the Brent Law Centre is able to advise on this issue.
Brent Law Centre argues there will inevitably be far more possession cases in the county court because landlords, whether council or private, will bring court action for rent arrears. In addition, they believe that the impact on costs for other departments, such as social services and child protection need to be assessed.
Brent Law Centre, only through the goodwill of an army of unpaid volunteers, is currently able to provide legal advice and assistance for residents of Brent on a range of legal issues including education, employment, housing, immigration, mental health, public law and welfare benefits.
An unlikely solution?
It has not gone unnoticed that one of the effects of losing £350m from the existing £2.1bn budget may be to put corporate law firms under greater pressure to contribute to the provision of legal aid.
High profile pro-bono interventions by the household names in corporate law can become tied to big international events – such as helping out at the Sierra Leone war crimes tribunal (Weil Gotshal & Manges), or representing wounded soldiers in compensation cases against the Ministry of Defence (Hogan Lovells).
Nonetheless, doing pro bono has become attractive to graduates in an increasingly competitive job market, where law firms are keen to attract the best graduates, and graduates are keen to demonstrate their social awareness.
However, it is true that many newly-qualified graduates do contribute much time for free to the local community, often in very deprived areas, but find the work immensely fulfilling. This is despite the fact that their Managing Associates and Partners will not tolerate any compromises in their professional ‘day job’.
Who knows where this is heading?
The ideal outcome might be for a restructuring of legal aid services, such that the public and lawyers have a clear idea where the money is going to, and which enables fair access to legal services for the public. The crunch question inevitably becomes: “where this money is coming from, if it’s not the taxpayer?”
Brent Law Centre is just a single example of where professional lawyers give their skills free-of-charge for the benefit of the community, but it would be tragic to see a situation where lawyers cannot even do this because of the ‘system’.
It might be, even, that the corporate lawyers have a crucial part to play for the benefit of society, in contributing towards the maintenance of legal aid in the high street law.