Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech

Home » Posts tagged 'verbal reasoning tests'

Tag Archives: verbal reasoning tests

Chris Grayling would like to help you enter solicitors' training!



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verbal reasoning tests are designed to identify an individual’s level of ability to understand and respond to questions about information provided in a passage of text. A candidate is advised to read a given passage of text and then consider the questions which are presented as statements corresponding to the passage. They are then required to decide whether the statement given is true, false, or whether he or she cannot say, given the information contained in the passage.

Consider the following passage about Chris Grayling and “price competitive tendering”:

Price-competitive tendering for criminal defence services will be introduced this autumn under accelerated plans revealed by the justice secretary this morning. In a written ministerial statement, Chris Grayling announced an eight-week consultation on the plans will begin in April – but said that the tender for contracts will open in the autumn. The government expects the first contracts to go live in the autumn of 2014. In a statement issued in December 2011, the government said it would consult on the introduction of price competition in autumn 2013. However Grayling said today: ‘Given the need to achieve savings as quickly as possible, we have decided to accelerate that timetable. The Labour government had sought to introduce price-competitive tendering, but abandoned its proposals after strong resistance from the profession, especially from smaller firms. Grayling said that, through the Legal Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the government had already sought to reduce legal aid spent on civil cases, but he said that criminal defence represents by far the largest element of the remaining legal aid spend, accounting for over £1bn a year.

 

The first thing to note that the length of this passage is about 180 words. The length of passages vary in verbal reasoning tests, but this would be a reasonable length. It’s unlikely you will get a story which is politically charged, involving law, or from the news; so this type of article would definitely not be used in a verbal reasoning test.

However, I should like to use this passage and a number of worked examples to illustrate techniques used by people who set these tests.

 

QUESTION 1

Chris Grayling is the first Lord Chancellor to hold a Doctorate in law.

No information is given about Grayling’s qualifications in this article. You may know that he studied history as an undergraduate student at Cambridge, and indeed holds a degree in that. However, this is inside information. The answer is therefore ‘CANNOT SAY’, as nothing in the passage leads you to say it is either true or false.

QUESTION 2

Chris Grayling announced a four-week consultation.

This statement is DEFINITELY FALSE, as the passage states clearly that Chris Grayling announced an eight-week consultation. 

QUESTION 3

According to Chris Grayling, Labour abandoned its proposals after strong resistance from the profession, including from larger firms.

This is difficult as we are told that Labour, “abandoned its proposals after strong resistance from the profession, especially from smaller firms.” Larger firms might have protested against the said proposals, for all we know, so the statement is, as far as the candidate is concerned, NEITHER TRUE NOR FALSE.

 QUESTION 4

According to Chris Grayling, the government has already sought to reduce legal aid spent on civil cases, but he said that criminal defence represents a very small element of the remaining legal aid spend.

The second half of this statement is clearly false, given the information given at the end this passage, making the entire statement FALSE. If part of your statement in the question is FALSE, that makes THE WHOLE STATEMENT FALSE.

QUESTION 5

The government expects the first contracts to go live before 2016.

Given that the government expects the first contracts to go live in the autumn of 2014, it must be true that the government expect the first contracts to go live before 2016.

 

Good luck! And just remember – if you pass that verbal reasoning test thanks to this – just remember that it was Chris Grayling who helped you take your first steps into the legal profession!

 

 

 

 

Practice verbal reasoning tests – blogpost 1 (biology)



You may well have to do an online verbal reasoning test (psychometric test) as part of your training contract application.

In a verbal reasoning test, you are usually provided with a passage of information and required to evaluate a set of statements by selecting one of the following possible answers:

A – True (The statement follows logically from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

B – False (The statement is logically false from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

C – Cannot Say (Cannot determine whether the statement is true or false without further information)

In the example below, give your answer to each question by clicking on either A, B or C. You will be told whether your answer is correct or not.

Passage:

Over 60 years ago, evolutionary biologist Bernhard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species such as humans, whereas females outdo them in small-bodied species such as spiders. Now it turns out that many plants obey Rensch’s rule too. Most plants produce both male and female sex organs, but around 7 percent are dioecious, meaning individuals are purely male or female. Recent results provide that female stems also must be large enough to display the fruit and support the animals that spread the pollen or seeds. If metabolism, predators or climate promote the evolution of smaller plants, however, males can shrink because their gametes are smaller. 

The questions might be as follows.

1. Over 80 years ago, Bernard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species.

CANNOT SAY – the passage says that Bernard Rensch calculated this over 60 years ago, but it is not possible to say from the passage whether he calculated this over 80 years ago.

2. Around 7% of plants are dioecious, but it is not necessary for female stems to be large enough to display the fruit.

FALSE – whilst the first part of the statement is true according to the passage, the second part of the statement is clearly false, making the entire statement false.

 

So what’s the best way to prepare for your verbal reasoning test?

You are advised to practice any available good-quality example questions, and any books you can get your hands on with similar questions, and read our advice here. If you prepare properly for your test you will have nothing to worry about. Being prepared and knowing what to expect in your verbal reasoning test will go a long way to helping you perform your best. These verbal reasoning tests used by employers in their selection process aim to measure your ability to read, comprehend and interpret written information. Verbal reasoning tests are designed to test your powers of comprehension and logic.

You will be tested on whether you jump to conclusions or you appreciate the limitations of a statement. If a passage says “it has been reported…” it does not follow that the fact is necessarily true, only that it has been reported. Another classic example is: “if the lights in a house come on, does that mean there is someone inside the building?” Not necessarily.

“If A is bigger than B, does that mean B is small?” Not necessarily. You will be tested to sort fact from inference, a lot like what’s required in a real work environment. You can therefore see why lawyers almost always have to pass a verbal reasoning test.

Through practice, you will develop your own technique for answering verbal reasoning questions to the best of your ability, however for most people the best way to approach them is to read the entire passage through once, then turn to the questions. Read the first statement and refer back to the relevant part of the passage to carefully consider if the statement is true, false, or impossible to determine without further information. It will often come down to just one or two sentences within the passage.

You should have an idea of how much time to allow yourself for each question and know when to move on. Concentration is essential, especially when every second counts.  Base your answers on only the information contained in the passage. This is crucial, and if you don’t do this you will probably get a lot of the questions wrong. Verbal reasoning tests are not tests of what you know, they are tests of how well you understand written information.

 

PASSAGE

New evidence shows that A-levels, examined in England, in a range of subjects don’t equip students with an appropriate level of mathematical skills. Also, different exam boards have recently been shown to provide varying levels of mathematical difficulty. As a result, a number of learned societies, has made recommendations for the upcoming A-level reform. SCORE (Science Community Representing Education), a collaboration of leading science organisations, publishes a new report today, Friday 27 April. This analyses the type, extent and difficulty of mathematics within the 2010 A-level exams for the three sciences. The report consider whether the type of mathematics in the examinations was suitable for progression within the subject’s field, the proportion of the examination that depended on mathematical knowledge, and the complexity of the mathematical questions. An expert claimed that these reports are extremely worrying, and we will be working hard to help improve the standard and relevance of A-levels.

Question 1. A-levels are a new exam.

CANNOT SAY. No information is given about when A-levels were first introduced in England.

QUESTION 2. This report considered mathematics in A-level examinations in Chemistry, Physics and Biology.

CANNOT SAY. The article does not specify which three sciences were studied in the report.

 

PASSAGE

Berries are good for you, that’s no secret. But can strawberries and blueberries actually keep your brain sharp in old age? A new study by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital finds that a high intake of flavonoid rich berries, such as strawberries and blueberries, over time, can delay memory decline in older women by 2.5 years.  The research team used data from subjects from the Nurses’ Health Study who completed health and lifestyle questionnaires beginning in 1976. Findings show that increased consumption of blueberries and strawberries was associated with a slower rate of memory decline in older women. A greater intake of anthocyanidins and total flavonoids was also associated with reduced memory decline. Researchers observed that women who had higher berry intake had delayed memory decline by up to 2.5 years.

Question 3. Berries which are high in flavonoids include blueberries.

TRUE. This is indeed specified in the third sentence of the passage.

QUESTION 4. Consumption of blueberries is associated with a faster rate of memory decline in older women.

CANNOT SAY. It is not possible to make this claim, for certain, from this passage.

 

 

PASSAGE

A research team at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden has succeeded in describing the structure and function of the outermost layer of the skin – the “stratum corneum” – at a molecular level. This opens the way not only for the large-scale delivery of drugs via the skin, but also for a deeper understanding of skin diseases. The upper layer of the skin is a watertight barrier called the stratum corneum. They have now structure determined this barrier layer at a molecular level, unlocking the secrets of the skin’s perviousness. This will hopefully enable the widespread administration of drugs though the skin instead of via pills or injections, which brings several advantages; for example, it means that drugs can be delivered evenly over time instead of in doses.

Question 5. The structure and function of the ‘stratum corneum’ had never been elucidated at a molecular level.

CANNOT SAY. Whilst a research team at Karolinska Institutet has succeeded in describing these recently, the article does not state whether this is a new discovery.

Question 6. Medications through the skin will become more common.

CANNOT SAY. The article states clearly that such medications ‘will hopefully’ become available.

 

PASSAGE

A team reveals that playing an action videogame, even for a relatively short time, causes differences in brain activity and improvements in visual attention.  Previous studies have found differences in brain activity between action videogame players and non-players, but these could have been attributed to pre-existing differences in the brains of those predisposed to playing videogames and those who avoid them. This is the first time research has attributed these differences directly to playing video games. Twenty-five subjects — who had not previously played videogames — played a game for a total of 10 hours in one to two hour sessions. Subjects who played the shooter videogame and also showed the greatest improvement on the visual attention task showed significant changes in their brain activity. The remaining subjects — including those who had played the puzzle game — did not.

Question 7.  The improvements in visual attention are caused by differences in brain activity.

CANNOT SAY. No statement about causality of these processes is mentioned in this passage.

Question 8. The average length of time spent per session, for most subjects, was 5.

CANNOT SAY. It is not possible to make this statement from the information provided.

 

PASSAGE

They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. Fortunately, this is not always true. Our brain processes information in complex networks of nerve cells. The cells communicate and excite one another through special connections, called synapses. Young brains are capable of forming many new synapses, and they are consequently better at learning new things. That is why we acquire vital skills – walking, talking, hearing and seeing – early on in life. The adult human brain stabilises the synapses so that we can use what we have learned in childhood for the rest of our lives. Earlier research found that approximately one fifth of the synapses in the brain inhibit rather than excite other nerve-cell activity. Neuroscientists have now shown that many of these inhibitory synapses disappear if the adult brain is forced to learn new skills.  

Synapses are found in complex networks of nerve cells.

TRUE. This statement is clearly true, on the basis of information given in the first two sentences.

Approximately 80% of synapses in the human brain excite other nerve-cell activity.

CANNOT SAY. Approximately 80% of synapses – in total – either excite other nerve-cell activity, or have no effect on their nerve-cell activity.

 

(c) All original material Legal Recruit 2012. All rights reserved.

Legal Recruit is an independent initiative and nothing to do with BPP.

@legal_recruit has the right to be identified as the author of this publication. All rights reserved. Any unauthorised broadcasting, copying or re-recording (duplication) will constitute an infringement of copyright. Permission granted to reproduce for personal and educational use only. Commercial copying, hiring, lending is prohibited. No further selling of this publication is permitted without the prior consent of the author. Whilst the materials are based on real news stories which have appeared in the media, the author takes no responsibility about the accuracy of the content therein. Any misrepresentation of persons or their work is entirely unintended.

What are online verbal reasoning tests for training contract applications?



Why do employers use verbal reasoning tests? Put simply: because they are felt to be better at predicting job performance than interviews, CVs and personality questionnaires.

Most employers use an online form of the verbal reasoning test now. This works very well for the pre-selection stage, after the initial application form, before the assessment centre stage. Candidates are asked to login to an online testing environment, and sit an unsupervised test via a computer. For the employer, the online verbal reasoning assessment procedure saves time and cost as lots of candidates can quickly be assessed this way en masse. For the candidate it means you don’t have to travel, and it is hoped that you are more likely to feel relaxed and comfortable taking the test. It is perfectly possible for you to ‘train’ to become good at these tests.

If the employer likes your application and you score well in your online test they will may or may not invite you in for an interview and another test but this time supervised.   For online verbal reasoning tests, it’s even more important to practice, since this will allow you to become familiar with the test interface and test style. If you are familiar with the types of test you have to face, you are more likely to perform your best and maximise your chances of success. It is now considered too, apparently from a vast body of research, that one of the critical determinants of success is the extent to which you’re expecting to do well!

In many verbal reasoning tests, you are provided with a passage of information and required to evaluate a set of statements by selecting one of the following possible answers:

A – True (The statement follows logically from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

B – False (The statement is logically false from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

C – Cannot Say (Cannot determine whether the statement is true or false without further information)

This is exactly the same format as the SHL verbal reasoning test. SHL is one of the most likely test providers you will meet in the legal recruitment process.

Take, for example, this passage.

Over 60 years ago, evolutionary biologist Bernhard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species such as humans, whereas females outdo them in small-bodied species such as spiders. Now it turns out that many plants obey Rensch’s rule too. Most plants produce both male and female sex organs, but around 7 per cent are dioecious, meaning individuals are purely male or female. Recent results provide that female stems also must be large enough to display the fruit and support the animals that spread the pollen or seeds. If metabolism, predators or climate promote the evolution of smaller plants, however, males can shrink because their gametes are smaller.

The statement you’re asked to judge might be this:

Over 80 years ago, Bernard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species.

The answer is CANNOT SAY. The passage says that Bernard Rensch calculated this over 60 years ago, but it is not possible to say from the passage whether he calculated this over 80 ye;ars ago.

Verbal reasoning tests are designed to test your powers of comprehension and logic. You will be tested on whether you jump to conclusions or you appreciate the limitations of a statement. If a passage says “it has been reported…” it does not follow that the fact is necessarily true, only that it has been reported.  You can therefore see why lawyers almost always have to pass a verbal reasoning test.

Through practice, you will develop your own technique for answering verbal reasoning questions to the best of your ability, however for most people the best way to approach them is to read the entire passage through once, then turn to the questions. Read the first statement and refer back to the relevant part of the passage to carefully consider if the statement is true, false, or impossible to determine without further information. It will often come down to just one or two sentences within the passage.

 

The new @Legal_Recruit verbal reasoning practice assessment for law students



The @Legal_Recruit system (which will be available here) is a very attractive easy-to-use cloud-based service which will allow @Legal_Recruit learners to complete sample tests, under real assessment conditions.

It will be available on Monday 3 October 2011 for the first time.

Current law students, who are doing the GDL, LPC, LLB(Hons) or LLM, especially those who are seeking training contracts or vacation placements for 2013/4/5 being made available in the next academic year may find this new service/product useful. It will be available on the internet via a secure website, and will cost £7.50 for unrestricted lifetime use. All Legal Recruit learners will have their own secure website username and password, and be invited to participate in the development of the huge bank of validated questions. These questions are set in a fair way, with due attention to equality, diversity and culture.

This product has been built because it is felt by many that law students,  the staff of their colleagues/universities (including their academics and their career services) and corporate law recruiting managers that the pivotal importance of the verbal reasoning test is grossly underestimated. This is not sensible, given the intense effort needed to complete any qualification in law. However, if your performance in a verbal reasoning test, and you fail to meet the cut-off score, it is possible that you will not be invited for interview, despite having a II.1 or above. This is clearly a tragedy.

Such practice will be ideal for any law students needing to complete a SHL Direct assessment for their real training contract/vacation placement application. Candidates are strongly advised to look, as a top priority, the practice tests in the practice area of the SHL website. There you can take a full-length verbal reasoning test which has been made available from the main SHL Direct website and it’s well worth looking at the example questions. You’ll also most likely enjoy looking at the advice given about verbal reasoning tests on leading corporate law recruitment sites, such as Eversheds and Clifford Chance. Obviously, Legal_Recruit does not actively endorse any of the entities above, or vice versa.

There will be very clear instructions in the @Legal_Recruit practice assessments which are akin to the current SHL verbal reasoning instructions. In the practice test, you are allowed to go backwards, although in the real assessment you will not be given this option. You must complete the practice examples before you do the test, and you are told not to press any function keys or do any background jobs such as printing during the test itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The word count per passage will ideally vary from 70 to 150, with a mean length of 107. Passages will avoid as far as possible the use of semi-colons, and be of no shorter than 8-10 words. They will be written in plain English, with no spelling or grammar errors. The passages will therefore avoid American spelling or American English. The mean number of words in a sentence will be about 15-20.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessments will consist of 30 questions, containing 15 passages (2 questions per passage). The 15 passages will be selected at random by the Legal_Recruit system from a huge database consisting of an equal number of questions in the following 16 subject areas.

  • Biology
  • Business
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Geography
  • Geology
  • Health and Safety
  • Human resources
  • Medicine
  • Modern Languages
  • Physics
  • Technology
  • Transport

@Legal_Recruit follows the leading twitter accounts in the world which daily produce news stories, which make excellent narratives for the verbal reasoning assessment that Legal_Recruit will be offering.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal_Recruit learners will be able to choose a maximum time permitted from 19 to 39 minutes; this is to that it’s easy to do the assessments with reasonable adjustments for learners who will benefit from them to allow them to perform on a ‘level-playing field’.

It’s interesting that there is no subject bias at all in the exemplars. Interestingly the passages appears to avoid contentious branding, politics, or subjects which are generally controversial.

It is essential for our system to work for our questions to be carefully set in keeping with the real verbal reasoning tests which our Legal_Recruit learners will face in their real assessments set by SHL for their training contract/vacation placements. If you would like to participate for free, and receive immediate feedback, in our sample assessments, please direct message @legalaware or @legal_recruit, and if there are any problems in me following you, please do let me know immediately, and I will remedy. We benefit from obtaining a huge bank of normative data, which indicates to us that all the questions are of the same (correct) standard, and from being able to give you an accurate indication of where you sit on the normal distribution curve.

You may enjoy following up-to-date developments in online psychometric assessment on the @SHLGROUP twitter feed.

 

Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech