Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech

Home » Posts tagged '@SHLGroup'

Tag Archives: @SHLGroup

The new @Legal_Recruit verbal reasoning practice assessment for law students



The @Legal_Recruit system (which will be available here) is a very attractive easy-to-use cloud-based service which will allow @Legal_Recruit learners to complete sample tests, under real assessment conditions.

It will be available on Monday 3 October 2011 for the first time.

Current law students, who are doing the GDL, LPC, LLB(Hons) or LLM, especially those who are seeking training contracts or vacation placements for 2013/4/5 being made available in the next academic year may find this new service/product useful. It will be available on the internet via a secure website, and will cost £7.50 for unrestricted lifetime use. All Legal Recruit learners will have their own secure website username and password, and be invited to participate in the development of the huge bank of validated questions. These questions are set in a fair way, with due attention to equality, diversity and culture.

This product has been built because it is felt by many that law students,  the staff of their colleagues/universities (including their academics and their career services) and corporate law recruiting managers that the pivotal importance of the verbal reasoning test is grossly underestimated. This is not sensible, given the intense effort needed to complete any qualification in law. However, if your performance in a verbal reasoning test, and you fail to meet the cut-off score, it is possible that you will not be invited for interview, despite having a II.1 or above. This is clearly a tragedy.

Such practice will be ideal for any law students needing to complete a SHL Direct assessment for their real training contract/vacation placement application. Candidates are strongly advised to look, as a top priority, the practice tests in the practice area of the SHL website. There you can take a full-length verbal reasoning test which has been made available from the main SHL Direct website and it’s well worth looking at the example questions. You’ll also most likely enjoy looking at the advice given about verbal reasoning tests on leading corporate law recruitment sites, such as Eversheds and Clifford Chance. Obviously, Legal_Recruit does not actively endorse any of the entities above, or vice versa.

There will be very clear instructions in the @Legal_Recruit practice assessments which are akin to the current SHL verbal reasoning instructions. In the practice test, you are allowed to go backwards, although in the real assessment you will not be given this option. You must complete the practice examples before you do the test, and you are told not to press any function keys or do any background jobs such as printing during the test itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The word count per passage will ideally vary from 70 to 150, with a mean length of 107. Passages will avoid as far as possible the use of semi-colons, and be of no shorter than 8-10 words. They will be written in plain English, with no spelling or grammar errors. The passages will therefore avoid American spelling or American English. The mean number of words in a sentence will be about 15-20.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessments will consist of 30 questions, containing 15 passages (2 questions per passage). The 15 passages will be selected at random by the Legal_Recruit system from a huge database consisting of an equal number of questions in the following 16 subject areas.

  • Biology
  • Business
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Geography
  • Geology
  • Health and Safety
  • Human resources
  • Medicine
  • Modern Languages
  • Physics
  • Technology
  • Transport

@Legal_Recruit follows the leading twitter accounts in the world which daily produce news stories, which make excellent narratives for the verbal reasoning assessment that Legal_Recruit will be offering.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal_Recruit learners will be able to choose a maximum time permitted from 19 to 39 minutes; this is to that it’s easy to do the assessments with reasonable adjustments for learners who will benefit from them to allow them to perform on a ‘level-playing field’.

It’s interesting that there is no subject bias at all in the exemplars. Interestingly the passages appears to avoid contentious branding, politics, or subjects which are generally controversial.

It is essential for our system to work for our questions to be carefully set in keeping with the real verbal reasoning tests which our Legal_Recruit learners will face in their real assessments set by SHL for their training contract/vacation placements. If you would like to participate for free, and receive immediate feedback, in our sample assessments, please direct message @legalaware or @legal_recruit, and if there are any problems in me following you, please do let me know immediately, and I will remedy. We benefit from obtaining a huge bank of normative data, which indicates to us that all the questions are of the same (correct) standard, and from being able to give you an accurate indication of where you sit on the normal distribution curve.

You may enjoy following up-to-date developments in online psychometric assessment on the @SHLGROUP twitter feed.

 

The sample verbal reasoning test of SHL Direct



Please note that since this post was published, I have built my own platform to help law students shine at tests such as the SHL verbal reasoning test. My platform doesn’t have the same number of questions, time taken per passage, word length, necessarily, as ‘the real thing’ and I have no knowledge of any of the real SHL exemplars, but I hope you find the platform useful. A lot of the stuff on it is free in fact – you can find it here.

As my own Ph.D. was in cognitive neuropsychology, I must admit that I find the design of the verbal reasoning test by SHL Direct fascinating. These days a candidate for a training contract will need to complete an online verbal reasoning test prepared by SHL Direct for the law firm; sometimes the Watson Glaser is used in preference.

There is no doubt that the new-look practice test presented on their website is extremely useful for aspiring candidates for legal training contracts. There are 17 stories in the practice test. The word count per passage varies from 70 to 153, with a mean length of 107. The length of the passages therefore vary somewhat, with a standard deviation of 27. The word count per sentence also makes for interesting reading. Some sentences are as short as 8 words; the longest sentence has 49 words (but broken up with semi-colons). The use of semi-colons is actually very infrequent, and overall it appears that the passages are written in plain English, with no spelling or grammar errors. The passages avoid American spelling or American English. The mean number of words in a sentence is 24, with a standard deviation of only 8.

It’s interesting that there is no subject bias at all in the exemplars. Interestingly the passages appears to avoid contentious branding, politics, or subjects which are generally controversial. The topics are sometimes hard to classify, and a popular theme of some of the passages are where there appear to be quantifiable trends. I think the subjects are approximately as follows: geography and the environment, economics, technology, business, human resources, transport, business, biology, medicine, health and safety, technology, biology, education, environment and energy, and geology. I remember seeing a physics-based question in a real test, but I have never seen a chemistry-based question. I am sure that questions in other fields do exist. I have seen in my time other preparatory questions, from other test providers, on (non-controversial) political initiatives, and modern languages, for example.

I feel on the whole the questions are superbly set, with very clear instructions. In the practice test, you are allowed to go backwards, although in the real test you may not get this option. You must complete the practice examples before you do the test, and you are told not to press any function keys or do any background jobs such as printing during the test itself. Candidates for the verbal reasoning test for training contract applications seem to stand to benefit much from suitable practice.

 

Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech