Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech

Home » Posts tagged 'proactivity'

Tag Archives: proactivity

Making the initial training contract application to the graduate recruitment officer



Different  recruiters  will  have  their  own  ways  of  assessing  these  forms.  Some  look  at  the  holistic  nature  of  the  form,  more  than  others.  Some  require  cover  letters,  but  others  do  not,  and  such  firms  put  a  lot  on  emphasis  on  their  cover  letters.  This  document  is  not  supposed  to  provide  the  substrate  of  a  ‘perfect  answer’  for  the  “marking  matrix”  used  by  these  firms,  but  is  supposed  to  provide  clues  as  to  the  rationale  for  asking  the  question  in  the  first  place.

Competencies  are  knowledge  and  skills  statements  and  not  task  statements.  For  example:  conducting  the  meetings  is  a  task.  In  order  to  do  so,  one  needs  required  competency.  Therefore,  in  this  case  the  required  competency  is  the  combination  of  skills  to  make  an  agenda,  to  promote  a  healthy  group  process,  to  resolve  conflicts,  to  manage  time  etc.  

General suggestions

  •  Be  clear  in  your  own  mind  why  you  want  to  join  the  firm  and  why  you  wish  to  become  a  commercial  lawyer.  What  is  it  that  really  interests  you  about  the  work  we  do?  Match  what  you’ve  got  to  what  they’re  looking  for.  Most  employers  nowadays  select  against  criteria.  The  more  precisely  you  match  them,  the  harder  it  is  for  them  to  avoid  interviewing  you!  A  detailed  list  of  what  they’re  looking  for  often  comes  with  the  application  form  but,  if  not,  go  systematically  through  their  website  or  recruitment  literature;  you  may  find  it  especially  useful  to  look  at  their  graduate   recruitment  pages,  especially  “what  we’re  looking  for”  and  any  statements  of  competences  or  shared  values  of  the  firm.  Knowing  precisely  what  they  want  will  help  you  match  up  your  own  qualities  when  you  complete  the  form.
  • You’re  applying  to  a  commercial  law  firm  so  you  will  be  expected  to  know  about  the  world  of  business  and  the  issues  that  affect  the  firm  and  its  clients.  It’s  probably  worth  your  while  if  you  identify  one  or  two  key  business  or  legal  news   stories  that  interest  you  and  follow  them  for  at  least  a  few  weeks  before  the   interviews,  so  you  can  talk  quite  broadly  about  the  main  issues.
  • Take  your  time.  Look  at  various  websites,  brochures,  careers  fairs,  presentations,  and  other  online  resources  like  http://www.allaboutcareers.com/ .  Time  spent  preparing  is  time  well  spent.  It’ll  make  those  “why  do  you  want  to  work  for  us?”  questions  so  much  easier.  With  longer  forms  you  may  need  to  break  it  into  chunks,  filling  the  form  in  over  two  or  three  sessions.
  • Make  it  easy  for  the  graduate recruitment officer.      Give  your  answers  a  clear  structure.  Directly  match  the  skills  they  want  to  your  own,  using  headings  if  necessary.  Think  about  what  sets  you  apart  from  other  applicants.  This  is  your  chance  to  sell  yourself,  so  use  a  range  of  examples  from  both  inside  and  out  of  university  to  highlight  your  skills  and  achievements.
  • Where’s  the  evidence?  Many  applications  lack  the  individuality  injected  by  small  bits  of  specific  detail  which  make  them  come  alive.  Give  relevant  interesting  examples  -­  go  into  detail.  Make  every  effort  to  include  practical  examples  of  when  and  where  you’ve  demonstrated  the  skills  they  want.
  • Don’t  be  modest.  Application  forms  (and  interviews)  are  all  about  letting  people  know  what  we’re  good  at.      
  • Treat  it  like  an  exam  i.e. answer  the  question!  Recognise  a  multi-part  question  and  tackle  all  its  parts  separately,  using  sub-­??headings  or  breaking  it  up  into  paragraphs.  Treat  each  bit  separately –  don’t  smudge  it  into  a  single  answer.
  • Don’t  be  afraid  of  your  failures.  Application  forms  can  read  like  an  unstinting  list  of  successes.  It’s  sometimes  worth  going  on  to  analyse  the  lessons  learned  –  why  did  things  go  wrong,  how  might  you  do  them  differently  next  time?
  • Vary  it!    Get  together  a  list  of  examples  you  might  use.  You  can  call  on  all  sorts  of  things  -­ holidays,  summer  jobs,  flatshares,  voluntary  work,  committees.  Then  go  through  the  form,  considering  which  example  is  strongest  for  each  of  the  answers.  Think  about  the  job  you’re  applying  for,  and  try  to  use  the  most  relevant  examples.
  • Don’t  overdo  the  academic.    Employers  seek  rounded  individuals,  adept  in  a  number  of  situations,  not  people  whose  main  experience  of  teamwork,  achievement,  challenge  and  communication  comes  through  their  course.
  • Attention to detail is a key skill for a lawyer and this starts with your application, so check thoroughly for grammar and spelling errors. his is the number one training contract application mistake to avoid on every recruiter’s list. There are good reasons for this. It is something that can be easily avoided. Quickly pasting your work into a word processor for a grammar and spelling check should get most of the job done. Printing a hard copy and proof reading it, with a pen in hand, will do the rest. Do this when you are completely cold to what you have written, the next morning for example. Making these types of mistakes shows a lack of attention to detail, which is not taken lightly by prospective employers. Given the type of service that Law firms provide to their clients, attention to detail is especially important. Errors in drafted legal documents expose cracks in a firm’s amour of professionalism. You can imagine that a client will then start to question the firm’s competence in other less visible but more important areas. Drafting errors also provide ammunition for the opposite side and their lawyers. In the manoeuvreing that happen during negotiations it is much harder to hold your ground and assert your side of the argument if your work is being questioned for lack of quality.
  • Copy and pasting. There are no shortcuts to a well-written and constructed application. Next to spelling and grammar errors, cutting and pasting from other sources is not only a waste of time with applications, but also easy enough to detect. Copying and pasting is often betrayed by inappropriate or incorrect information. Addressing the application to the wrong person or company happens all too often.

 

?  Give an example of ..”

Competencybased  questions  often  involve  you  demonstrating  these  key  attributes  so  really  think  about  the  answers  you  give  and  explain  your  examples  in  full.  Examples  should  have  a  clear  structure  to  highlight  your  skills  and  achievements  but  remember  to  answer  the  question  succinctly.  If  you  need  help  with  structure,  you  may  want  to  think  about  the  STAR  technique:

  • Situation
  • Task
  • Actions
  • Results

A  good  way  of  dealing  with  this  type  of  question  is  by  using  the  CAR  approach.  CAR  stands  for  Context,  Action,  Result.  It  helps  you  to  structure  your  answer  as  a  convincing  way.  The  CONTEXT  forms  an  introduction,  describing  the  scenario  you  faced,  date  and  place.  The  ACTION  forms  the  main  body  and  should  be  the  longest  part.  The  RESULT  is  the  conclusion,  and,  like  the  introduction,  should  be  quite  short.

Other  aspects  might  include:

  • Try  to  give  quantifiable  results  if  possible.
  • If  the  result  was  negative,  then  say  what  you  learned  from  the  experience,  and  what  you  would  do  differently  next  time.    Sometimes  interviewers  will  ask  you  about  a  situation  where  you  were  unsuccessful.  This  is  an  excellent  opportunity  to  demonstrate  how  well  you  learn  lessons  from  failure,  but  also  to  demonstrate  qualities  such  as  resilience  (to  bounce  back  and  try  again);  determination;  strength  of   character  (when  the  going  gets  tough,  the  tough  get  going!);  flexibility; initiative;  and   lateral  thinking.  There  is  a  saying  that  “The  most  successful  people  have  failed  the  most   as  the  best  way  to  learn  is  via  your  mistakes.
  • Don’t  go  into  too  much  background  detail  –  keep  to  the  point!  Often  there  isn’t   enough  room  to  use  the  CAR  approach,  but  it’s  still  worth  keeping  in  mind  when  you   prepare  your  draft  answer.   Think  of  the  most  relevant  examples,  rather  than  the  most  impressive”.
  • Use  action  verbs  to  improve  your  content.

 

?  Background

“[X]  has  minimum  academic  requirements,  so  before  completing  our  application  form  please  give   careful  consideration  to  the  following  questions:

Do  you  have  3  A  levels  at  grades  A,  B,  B  or  equivalent?  (N.B.  Taken  in  one  sitting  and  NOT  including  General  Studies.

Have  you  gained  or  are  you  realistically  expecting  to  gain  a  minimum  2.1  honours  degree  or  equivalent?

Have  you  previously  made  an  unsuccessful  application  to  []?”

 

?  Languages

Multiple  languages  can  be  added  by  selecting  the  language,  and  fluency  levels.

?  Education

Percentage  grades  are  now  required  for  undergraduate  and  postgraduate  subject  results.  You  are  required  to  ensure  that  your  institution  details  and  results  are  correct.  You  must  include  at  least  one  secondary  and  one  undergraduate  record  (including  all  results).  You  are  also  obliged  to  provide  a  complete  breakdown  of  all  your  grades  by  subject,  obtained    during  secondary  school  and  university.  Please  list  your  all  of  your  GCSEs  and  A’?  Levels  or  international  equivalent.

?   How did you hear about us?”

Various  options  are  given.  See  also  the  section  on  “Firm  choice”  below.  

?  Referees

You  are  normally  required  to  enter  details  of  two  employers  at  least,  sometimes  one  academic  and  one  vocational.

? Other details

Excluding motor offences not resulting in a custodial sentence or disqualification from driving, have you ever had a criminal  conviction (including  any spent conviction which, by virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Exceptions) Order 1975, should  be disclosed)?

You  will  need  to  disclose  any  criminal  convictions  anyway  if  you  wish  to  gain  student  enrolment  with  the  Solicitors  Regulation  Authority  to  do  the  Legal  Practice  Course.

Do you have any disability for which you require  any assistance for during the selection process?

As  well  as  being  a  practical  point  such  that  “reasonable  adjustments”  can  be  made  for  any  assessments  you  do,  including  for  online  assessments,  the  law  firm  will  be  interested  in  issues  of  accessibility  for  the  place  in  which  you  have  your  interview/other  assessments,  or  any  necessary  adjustments  (e.g.  special  lighting,  ergonomic  chair)  consistent  with  the  Equality  Act  [2010].

?  Work experience

Please  set out details of your work experience. (Normally 4 + “others”)

Many  large  solicitors’  firms  run  formal  work  experience  schemes,  generally  known  as  vacation  placements.    As  well  as  shadowing  solicitors  and  completing  small,  discrete  tasks  there  may  well  be  presentations  about  the  firm  and  its  work  and  a  number  of  social  events.    Unsurprisingly,  vacation  placements  are  extremely  popular  –  it  can  be  harder  to  get  onto  one  than  to  get  a  training  contract.  Most  vacation  placements  will  have  fixed  closing  dates.  As  well  as  spending  time  with  a  solicitors’  firm,  other  good  forms  of  legal  experience  include  volunteering  at  a  Citizens  Advice  Bureau  or  law  centre.

? Detailed questions

? Activities, interests, positions of responsibility

Please  give brief details of your key non-academic extra-curricular hobbies, activities, leisure interests, highlighting any positions of responsibility whether at school, university or otherwise.

Describe  your biggest achievement and/or most demanding position of responsibility you have held to date; why did this achievement stand out for you, and what did you learn  from this?

This  question  is  trying  to  assess  how  you  manage  your  time.  What  have  you  been  or  are  you  doing  whilst  studying  at  university  or  Law  School?  If  you  are  involved  with  any  sporting  or  charity  work  tell  them  all  about  it  -­ be  specific.  Talk  about  what  you  have  done,  what  contribution  that  has  made  and  what  you  gained  from  your  involvement.  These  activities  provide  opportunities  to  develop  skills  that  will  be  useful  at  work  and  your  response  should  show  that  you  understand  this.  A  simple  list  of  things  that  look  good  is  less  important  than  offering  evidence  of  what  you’ve  gained  from  them.  If  possible,  show  how  your  interests  have  developed  your  skills,  for  example  in  teamwork,  business  awareness,  or  communication.    Try  to  show  results  in  terms  of  objectives  set  and  achieving  improvements.  These  sections  are  often  quite  tight,  so  some  say  it’s  permissible  to  provide  an  answer  in  note  form.

? Prizes

Please  provide details of any academic prizes, distinctions, skills, scholarships and any other noteworthy achievements. In the case of skills please specify level of proficiency.

Sometimes  the  question  will  specify  which  “level”  of  your  education  these  refer  to,  e.g.  school,  college  or  university.

? Firm specification

Please  explain  why you think you are well suited  to [], and have chosen  to apply to [] for a training  contract or vacation scheme placement? why you think you would  make a successful trainee?

[X] is a leading  UK law firm. How do you think we are distinct from other law firms?

All [X] trainee  solicitors are based in our [Y] office. Please give your reasons for choosing  to live in or around and train at the [Y] office.

Again  this  question  is  trying  to  determine  your  commitment  to  a  career  and  specifically  your  commitment  to  their  particular  law  firm.  Recruiters  look  for  motivation,  commitment  and  enthusiasm.  So,  why  have  you  chosen  them?  Is  it  because  you  have  spoken  to  trainees  and  like  the  sound  of  the  firm’?s  working  environment?  Have  you  researched  their  work  and  found  a  specific  case  /  area  interesting?  Do  you  have  relevant  industrial  experience?  Do  you  have  a  language  or  are  from  a  country  that  they  have  clients  /  offices  in?  Is  there  something  particular  about  their  training  that  appeals  to  you?  Show  that  you  have  done  your  research  about  the  firm  and  that  you  are  genuinely  interested  in  them.

Apparently most  law  students  do  extensive  research  in  fact  into  their  choice  of  firm.   It’s  also  worth  noting  that @AllAboutCareers  and @AllAboutLaw  are  very  helpful in this regard, as well as “The Training Contract Handbook”.

? Career motivation

 What qualities do you think you possess  to be a successful lawyer in location [X] with [Y]? Which areas of law interest you and why?

Please  explain  what attracts you to a career as a solicitor at an international business  law firm, with reference to other careers  that you might have considered and why you chose  not to pursue them.

This question tries to determine your commitment to a career in law: the thinking and research you have done about the profession and what you want from a career as a lawyer. Can you demonstrate enough commitment and interest in law to persuade the firm to invest money and time in you for the Graduate Diploma in Law, Legal Practice Course and/or training contract? This may seem an obvious question but do you really know why you want to be a solicitor or barrister – think hard about it, this may be asked at interview.

If you can produce a convincing answer to this question you’re one step ahead. Think about what first sparked your interest in law, or what you like most about it. Maybe being a solicitor was your childhood dream, or maybe it runs in the family. Whatever the case, you need to show that you are passionate about the law. With all the academic requirements and vocational training, becoming a solicitor is a long-term project. To be offered a law training contract you need to show that you have the passion and the drive to see it through to the end.

Be specific in your reasons for choosing a legal career. Have you had any relevant work experience that has helped you to see first hand what a lawyer actually does? Have you had any personal experience of the work of a lawyer – perhaps through family or friends? Even if you have done pro bono in a law centre or a CAB, has this experience been useful in you understanding generic skills such as teamwork, communication or meeting deadlines? Has your law course or degree furthered your interest and commitment to law? Have you developed a substantial interest in access-to-justice? Have you had any relevant experience that has developed skills that would be easily transferable to a career as a lawyer?

The work of solicitors is more varied than you might think. There are a number of different settings in which solicitors work, for example commercial, private or in-house practice. You should be aware of the differences between the various settings, but if you’re not, do some research. Find out about the kind of role you might find yourself in if you were to go for commercial practice, for example. Is this what you hoped for when you embarked upon your law studies? If not, look into the other options. Being aware of your preferences is vital when choosing a firm with whom you want to carry out your training. Not only will it make what you learn more worthwhile, but you will find it easier to choose a firm. The firm will also find it easier to choose you.

For most training contract applicants, the choice boils down to the simple question: “Do I work in London, or do I work for a local regional firm? This is something of a personal choice, with implications that will affect your quality of life and your career. The largest firms are based in London and the legal market which circles the capital’s financial services industry is one of the most lucrative in the world. This translates into higher average pay packets for London solicitors. Aside from the careers benefits to choosing London, trainees can enjoy all the social and cultural activities that the cosmopolitan city has to offer. However, the cost of living is higher in London and you will have to content with the traffic and rush hour crushes on the tube. Working hours are often longer at London firms and you may find a more attractive work-life balance at firms outside of the capital. The choice, as always, is yours.

? Commercial awareness

Identify a current  commercial article that you read  or a recent  event  from the business  world which has attracted your attention recently.  Why do you consider  it to be significant? Who are the key stakeholders in this situation and what are the implications for those concerned?

Business  acumen and commercial awareness are important elements to becoming a successful solicitor. Please outline, in your opinion, why you think this would  be important and tell us about a time  when  you’ve demonstrated your abilities in this area. What was the occasion and what impact did possessing this awareness have over the final outcome?

Choose  a sector group of the firm and summarise the biggest challenges and opportunities they will face in the future.

Commercial  awareness  is  something  that  firms  almost  without  exception  mention  as  a  desirable  quality.  Commercial  awareness  is  generally  defined  as  a  candidate’?s  general  knowledge  of  business.  It  can  be  summed  up  as  an  interest  in  business  and  an  understanding  of  the  wider  environment  in  which  an  organisation  operates:  its  customers  and  competitors.  For  corporates,  this  is  about  establishing  “competitive  advantage”,  and  it’s  often  interesting  to  work  out  how  companies  enter  new  markets  (especially  the  BRIC  emerging  economies),  and  what  barriers  there  might  be  for  companies  competing  effectively  in  critical  markets.

Commercial  awareness  generally  means  an  understanding  of  a  client’?s  business  and  the  industry  or  sector  in  which  it  operates.  It  is  a  key  competency  for  applicants.  It  involves  not  only  keeping  up  to  date  with  commercial  issues  and  it  is  also  about  being  able  to  demonstrate  commercial  awareness  through  any  business/work  experience  and,  specifically,  the  applicant’s  understanding  of  the  type  of  firm  to  which  they  are  applying.  Clients  seek  business  solutions,  presented  in  a  way  that  makes  sense.  An  understanding  that  a  law  firm  operates  in  a  competitive  industry  is  also  considered  as  being  commercially  aware.

As  a  result  you  may  be  expected  to  demonstrate  an  understanding  as  to  how  the  firm  or  chambers  markets  itself  to  its  clients.  To  know  who  the  firm’s  main  competitors  are.  To  explain  how  you  would  attract  a  potential  client  by  explaining   the  unique  selling  points  of  the  firm  (USPs).  For  example,  if  you’re  applying  to  a  foreign  firm,  it’s  not  inconceivable  you  could  be  asked  who  the  major  players  are  in  that  particular  market  (e.g.  the  US  market).  In  addition  to  this  you  will  be  expected  to  know  about  the  practice  areas  in  which  the  firm  or  chambers   operate  and  to  be  aware  of  key  changes  in  legislation  and  the  economic  market  which  may  affect   the  way  in  which  they  operate.

Have  you  done  a  LL.M.  in  international  commercial  law  where  you  might  have  gained  important  experience  in  drafting  or  case  analysis  in  this  particular  field  of  law?  Have  you  even  done  a  M.B.A.  where  you  have  studied  business  management  in  great  detail?  You  could  also  think  about  participating  in  any  student  societies  where  you  are  doing  the  GDL  or  LPC  –  these  are  very  active  the  vast  majority  of  “learning  providers”.

Mention  any  business/commercial  experience  you  have  had,  including  non-­legal  work  and/or   roles  which  involve  dealing  with  clients  or  members  of  the  public.  Have  you  ever  been  a   Director  of  a  private  limited  company  yourself?  This  can  highlight  your  awareness  of  customer   needs  and  expectations.  Were  you  ever  given  the  task  of  improving  a  current  service  or  product?  Did  you  add  value  to  it?  If  so,  how  did  you  go  about  it,  what  factors  did  you  have  to  take  into  consideration?  Are  you  able  to  identify  the  long  term  and  short  term  goals  of  an  organisation  or   a  project?

Thinking  in  terms  of  a  SWOT  (the  strengths,  weaknesses,  opportunities  and  threats)   analysis  of  the  firm  or  legal  sector  can  be  helpful.

Did  you  have  a  key  role  in  any  society  committees  at  school  or  university?  Were  you  given  a  financial  role?  Any  of  these  can  be  good  indicators  that  you  have  had  to  think  about  different  perspectives  in  the  market  place.

Have  you  ever  raised  money  for  a  charity,  secured  sponsorship  for  an  event?  What  process  did  you  go  through   to  secure  the  funds?    Read  the  business  press  regularly.  Try  to  know  something  about  current  leading  stories/issues,  and  how  they  might  have  an  impact  on  the  firm’s  clients.  Look  out  for  stories  that  will  affect  the  firm  to  which  you  are  applying,  or  its  clients,  directly  or  indirectly.

Look  at  the  BBC  news  and  business  website.  Read  also  publications  like  the  Financial  Times,  the  Economist,  and  The  Lawyer.  There  are  business  related  programmes  on  BBC  Radio  which  are  also  available  to  listen  again  on-­??line  and  as  podcasts  such  as:

The  Bottom  Line  (with  @EvanHD)  http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/bottomline    “Insight  into  business  from  the  people  at  the  top.  Evan  Davis  meets  influential  business  leaders  for  a  round  table  conversation  about  the  issues  that  matter  to  their  companies  and  their  customers.”

 

? Proactivity

 Describe  an occasion when  you spotted an opportunity to make an improvement in ‘going the extra mile’, and took action without being asked  to do so. What steps did you take? What was the outcome? Explain why you think this attribute is relevant for a solicitor.

This  question  is  testing  your  problem  solving  ability.  Detail  what  the  issue  was,  why  it  was  difficult  and  then  what  you  did  to  resolve  it.  If  you  are  talking  about  a  group  activity,  do  not  put   ‘?we‘?  -­  they  are  interested  in  what  you  did.  As  with  all  your  answers  use  this  question  to   differentiate  yourself  i.e.  make  it  personal  and  substantiate  what  you  say  with  specific  examples.

Aspects  of  a  good  answer  might  be  as  follows.

  • Use  initiative  to  act  on  opportunities.  Become  a  leader  before  other  people  view  you  as  one.  Healthy  organisations  often  reward  those  who  take  the  lead,  not  just  those  with  formal  management  roles.
  • Take  responsibility  for  own  objectives:  set  priorities.  Display  a  “?can  do“?  attitude  even  in  demanding  situations.  Try  to  solve  problems,  rather  than  to  pass  them  on  to  other  people.
  • ?Go  the  extra  mile?  when  asked  to  do  tasks.  Go  beyond  your  job  description.  Do  work  that  gets  you  noticed.  Show  enthusiasm:  this  will  be  noticed  and  you  will  eventually  be  rewarded.
  • Take  ownership  of  problems:  anticipate  potential  problems,  take  pre-­emptive  action  and   act  quickly  to  resolve  problems.  Develop  innovative  practices.  Value  innovative  thinking.
  • Learn  new  skills  that  will  enhance  capability.

  

? Flexibility  

Describe  a time that you have had to change your approach to a project or task halfway through. What changes did you have to make? Why did you need to make these changes? What was the outcome?

This  means  that  you  are  able  to  modify  your  approach  to  achieve  a  goal,  and  you  are  open  to  change  and  new  information;  you  can  rapidly  adapt  to  new  information,  changing  conditions,  or  unexpected  obstacles.  Legal  recuiters  are  often  looking  for  the  following  aspects.

 

1.  Values  need  for  flexibility:  

  • Accepts  that  other  people’s  points  of  view  are  reasonable  or  valid.
  • Acknowledges  that  people  are  entitled  to  their  opinions,  and  accepts  that  they  are   different.
  • Steps  into  colleagues’  tasks  when  needed  or  required.

2.  Demonstrates  flexibility:  

  • Works  creatively  within  standard  procedures  to  fit  a  specific  situation.
  • Understands  policies  and  can  work  within  them  to  meet  office,  work  group,  team  or   individual  goals.

3.  Adapts  approach:  

  • Changes  one’s  approach  as  required  to  achieve  intended  outcomes.
  • Prioritises  actions  effectively  in  order  to  respond  to  numerous,  diverse  challenges  and   demands.

4.  Adapts  strategy:  

  • Changes  the  overall  service  plan  and  implements  new  practices  when  original  approach   and  assumptions  are  no  longer  valid.
  • Able  to  shift  strategic  focus  and  activities  quickly  in  response  to  changing  organisational  priorities.

? Teamwork

Teamwork  is  considered  crucial  to  functioning  well  as  a  trainee/junior  in  a  corporate  law  firm.  

Please  give an example of a situation where  you were required to work in a team to accomplish an important objective and describe your role in achieving  this objective.

A  law  student  who  is  good  at  teamwork  might:

  • Believe  that  working  together  with  others  or  in  teams  gives  higher  synergies  to  self  and   the  teams,  and  therefore  is  positive  and  enthusiastic  about  teamwork  and  team  building.
  • Contributes  significantly  when  working  as  a  member  of  a  team  or  when  working  as  a  team  leader  to  build  a  strong  team;  respects  all  the  members  of  the  team  and  cooperates  with  every  team  member  and  the  team  leader.
  • Provides  help  and  support  to  those  team  members  who  are  in  need  of  help  and  support,  and  shares  relevant  knowledge  and  information  with  all  the  team  members  including  the   team  leader.
  • Maintains  the  required  level  of  communication  in  terms  of  quality,  quantity  and   timeliness  with  the  team  members  and  the  team  leader.
  • When  working  as  a  team  leader,  facilitates  developing  team  goals  with  team  members’  participation.
  • Motivates  the  team  members  while  working  as  a  leader  of  the  team  or  even  when  working  as  a  member  of  the  team,  building  up  high  team  morale;  creates  a  sense  or  feeling  of  cohesiveness  among  the  fellow  members.
  • Is  good  at  resolving  the  conflicts  that  might  arise  due  to  diverse  personalities  of  various   team  members.
  • When  the  members  seem  to  err  from  the  shared  mission,  goals  and  priorities,  brings  them   back  on  the  desired  focus.
  • Seeks  for  each  and  every  member’?s  active  and  enthusiastic  participation  all  the  time  and  accordingly  motivates  the  members  who  seem  to  be  getting  disinterested  or  tuned  out  from  time  to  time.
  • Makes  every  member  feel  that  each  one’?s  work  or  contribution  is  equally  important.
  • Shares  credit  for  success  of  team  with  all  the  others  in  the  team.
  • Celebrates  the  team’?s  success  together  with  all  the  others  in  the  team.
  • Makes  sure  that  the  various  teams  do  not  become  islands  in  themselves  and  form   unnecessary  boundaries  around  them.

? Defining qualities of the candidate

 What can you tell us about yourself that sets you apart from other applicants, and which are convincing reasons why we should  recruit you?

In  a  sense,  your  answer  to  this  question  is  to  some  extent  governed  by  your  personal  qualities  not  covered  elsewhere  in  the  form.  Here  are  some  further  competences  which  might  be  relevant  here.

Integrity

A  trainee  will  be  expected  to  upholds  the  principles  of  the  current  SRA  Code  of  ConductSome   aspects  might  include:

  •  Holds  to  a  laudable  value  structure  all  the  time  and  in  all  the  situations.
  • Practices  integrity  while  dealing  with  everyone  and  therefore  is  regarded  as  trustworthy   person.
  • Does  not  turn  and  twist  the  information  to  gain  something  or  to  score  a  point  in  an   underhand  manner.
  • Uses  confidential  information  confidentially.  Does  not  divulge  the  confidential  information   even  under  any pressure.
  • Does  not  indulge  in  any  kind  of  corruption  or  corrupt  practices.
  • Motivates  others  to  practice  integrity  by  being  an  example  to  others.

Leadership

Some  aspects  might  include:

  •  Can  envision  the  advancement  and  growth  opportunities.
  • Possesses  abilities  for  high  degree  of  conceptualization,  strategising  and  analysis.
  • Demonstrates  high  achievement  orientation.  Therefore,  emphasises  commitment, accountability,  action  orientation  and  results.
  • Adept  at  interpersonal  relationships  and  puts  emotional  intelligence  in  action.
  • Excellent  communicator.
  • Uses  his  excellent  influencing  skills  for  bringing  out  the  desired  consensus,  decisions  and   actions.
  •  Very  good  at  decision  making  processes  and  once  decisions  are  reached,  displays  firmness  and  decisiveness  in  implementation.
  • Displays  required  flexibility  and  adaptability  in  different  situations  and  times.
  • Is  great  team  builder  and  team  player.  Provides  necessary  support  and  cooperativeness.
  • Possesses  high  commercial  awareness  and  business  acumen.
  • Develops  many  next  line  leaders.

? Communication skills

 All solicitors at [X] work with a wide range  of people so need to be able  to persuade, influence and display effective communication skills. Describe  a situation when  you have had to communicate effectively.

You  should  think  of  various  forms  of  effective  communications,  e.g.  oral  presentations,  written  papers,  written  papers,  drafting,  interviewing  or  advising  (on  the  LPC),  practical  legal  research  (on  the  LPC),  blogging,  participating  in  podcasts,  and  how  you  have  adapted  your  method  of  communication  according  to  the  target  audience.  Your  answer  is  bound  to  be  more  compelling  if  you  can  give  concrete  examples.  Some  related  specific  competences  are  given  as  below.

Persuasion

One  scenario  where  persuading  skills  can  be  important  is  the  job  interview,  but  the  following  tips   are  valuable  in  many  other  settings.

  • Focus  on  the  needs  of  the  other  party.  Take  time  to  listen  to  them  carefully  and  find  out  about  their  interests  and  expectations.  This  shows  that  you  are  really  interested  in  them  and  they  are  then  more  likely  to  trust  and  respect  you.  It  will  also  make  it  easier  for  you  to  outline  the  benefits  of  your  proposal  in  terms  they  understand.
  • Argue  your  case  with  logic.  Do  careful  research  on  your  ideas  and  those  of  your   competitors  (if  there  are  any)  and  make  sure  that  any  claims  you  make  can  be  verified.
  • Use  positive  rather  than  negative  language:  instead  of  saying  “?You’?re  wrong  about  this”?,   say  “?That’?s  true  but  ….”?,  “?That’?s  an  excellent  idea,  but  if  we  look  more  deeply  …..”?  or  “?I   agree  with  what  you  say  but  have  you  considered  ….”?.  

Listening

Some  aspects  might  include:

  • Believes  that  listening  strengthens  the  quality  of  communication,  interpersonal  relations,   human  relations,  emotional  intelligence,  conflict  management  and  team  management.
  • Every  interaction  requires  one  to  respond  and  since  the  quality  of  response  depends  on   the  quality  of  listening,  tries  to  improve  quality  of  his  listening  constantly.
  • Thus,  listens  to  understand  the  other  person  and  not  just  to  react,  reply,  control  or  manipulate  the  other  person.  By  understanding  the  other  person  properly,  can  respond  or  act  in  the  best  possible  manner.
  • Generally  respects  other  people  and  demonstrates  openness  and  trust  through  his  body   language  and  spoken  words.
  • Then,  paves  way  to  influencing  the  people  in  right  directions  by  diagnosing  the  issues  and   concerns  of  others  in  a  better  way  for  effective  problem  solving.
  • Promotes  a  more  participative  style  of  managing  by  involving  people.

? Conflict and pressure

The success  of [X] is built on the self-motivation and applied  effort of all its employees, as demonstrated by their ability to work through setbacks coping effectively with conflict and pressure.  Describe  a situation when  you have had to deal  with conflict and pressure. Which other people involved?  What did you learn about yourself?

Some  aspects  might  include  the  observations  that  the  law  student:

  • Recognises  the  fact  that  conflicts  are  quite  natural  in  any  organization  and  yet  these  need  appropriate  redressing  to  move  on  with  apt  solutions,  thereforeis  willing  to  take  up  the  responsibility  of  managing  and  resolving  the  conflict.
  • Can  think  through  clearly  in  a  conflicting  situation.
  • Keeps  his  eyes  constantly  on  the  desired  goals  and  therefore,  does  not  drift  away  from  them  despite  conflicting  arguments  and  points  of  views.
  • Listens  well  and  patiently  all  the  conflicting  arguments  and  presentations.
  •  Controls  the  people  and  their  communication  patterns  in  the  discussions  that  takes  place   when  resolving  a  conflict.
  • Facilitates  the  innovative  and  creative  thinking  of  the  people  caught  up  in  the  conflict.
  • Does  not  take  sides  of  any  particular  set  of  people  or  their  thinking.  Rather,  tries  to   facilitate  working  out  genuinely  appropriate  and  optimal  solutions.
  • Contributes  his  own  inputs,  ideas,  creativity  and  analysis  to  supplement  the  missing  or  erroneous  information  and  thus  uncover  the  real  issues  and  reasons  that  led  to  the  conflict.  Then  proceeds  to  help  find  the  answers.
  • Gains  agreements  without  leaving  behind  any  bitter  taste  or  disrupting  the  human   relationships.
  • Is  proactive  and  as  far  as  possible  anticipates  the  conflicting  situations  and  dissolves  them   well  before  they  turn  into  conflicts.

? Commitment to excellence

Describe  an occasion when  you have demonstrated commitment to a task or project  that resulted in you exceeding expectations either for yourself  or others. What steps did you take? What was the outcome?

You  will  be  able  to  achieve  the  excellence  in  any  skill  or  competency  only  if  you  rehearse  or  practice  the  learned  skill  a  large  number  of  times.  Knowledge  alone  is  no  guarantee  for  achieving  great  levels  in  skills  or  competencies.  For  example,  only  if  you  start  swimming,  you  will  become  a  swimmer;  mere  knowledge  of  swimming  or  great  theories  of  swimming  will  not  automatically  make  you  even  an  ordinary  swimmer.  Knowledge  surely  helps  and  is  a  must  but  without  doing,  it  is  of  no  use  to  you.  Implementation  of  knowledge  is  the  name  of  the  game.  Wisdom  is  in  knowing  what  to  do  and  how  to  do  but  the  virtue  is  doing  it.

It’s  said  that  you  should  become  both  consciously  and  unconsciously  competent  in  your  strive  for  excellence.  Consciously  competent  means  gaining  the  knowledge  about  the  skill  to  be  mastered  and  begin  practicing  the  knowledge  gained  (example:  gaining  knowledge  on  how  to  swim  using  proper  styles  of  swimming  and  start  swimming  using  the  right  styles  of  swimming).  On  the  other  hand,  unconsciously  competent  means  keep  practicing  the  knowledge  gained  till  you  gain   mastery  in  the  skill  (example:  you  have  now  become  an  expert  swimmer  since  you  have  been   swimming  using  the  proper  styles  of  swimming  over  number  of  hours  and  you  can  now  give  yourself  9  on  10  or  even  10  on  10).  For  greater  success  in  life,  you  should  try  to  reach  the  unconsciously  competent  level  in  the  skills  required  by  you  for  your  professional,  personal,  family  and  social  activities/tasks/projects.

? Personal challenge

Describe  a significant challenge that you have faced  outside of your academic studies ideally from the last 2 years. How did you initially analyse the challenge? What approach did you take to solving it? What did you learn from this challenge?

  • Successful  answers  to  these  sorts  of  questions  need  to  be  as  concrete  as  possible.  Supply  specific  detail  on  the  situation,  the  actions  taken  and  the  results  achieved.  Figures  can  be  particularly  useful  in  this  context.
  •  Your  example  need  not  be  very “significant”.  Go  for  something  you  genuinely  believe  to  be  a  real   achievement  rather  than  give  them  something  you  think  they  want  to  hear  -­ it’ll  be  more  convincing.  The  important  thing  is  to  set  it  in  context.  Explain  why  it  was  significant  to  you  -­ if  you’re  unsporty,  uncoordinated  and  broke  your  leg  six  months  previously,  learning  to  stay  upright  while  sliding  a  few  hundred  metres  downhill  may  well  have  been  a  major  achievement.    
  • A  useful  device  is  the  Trojan  horse  technique,  which  allows  you  to  smuggle  in  other   examples  as  in  “  I  considered  selecting  one  of  several  achievements,  including  x  and  y.  However  I   have  chosen  z  because…....”    

Aspects  of  a  convincing  answer  might  include  the  following.

1.  Recognises  Lack  of  Success:

Acknowledges  areas  where  expectations  are  not  met,  and  provides  reasons  which  may  or  may  not   involve  self.

2.  Remains  Positive:

Re-­energises  after  loss  or  failure  or  after  encountering  a  significant  hurdle  to  readdress  the  situation  and  to  overcome  it;  approaches  new  situations  with  continuing  positive  outlook,  despite  previous  disappointments.

3.  Takes  Responsibility:

Acknowledges  personal  responsibility  for  outcomes,  even  when  not  all  elements  of  a  situation  are   within  direct  control  but  could  have  been  personally  managed.

4.  Learns  from  Mistakes  and  Successes:

Analyses  situations  on  an  ongoing  basis  to  improve  own  performance;  designs  a  personal  action   plan  to  address  own  issues  constructively  and  decisively.

5.  Shares  Learning  with  Team:

Deals  openly  with  failure  by  bringing  team  together  to  define  specific  problems  and  present  solutions;  may  involve  team  in  diagnosis  and  in  developing  solutions  to  effectively  transfer  knowledge  into  the  organisation.

? Mitigating circumstances

Are there any important mitigating circumstances why you feel the exam  results you have listed do not fully reflect your abilities?

There  may  be  good  reasons  why  you  ‘underperformed’,  due  to  recent  bereavement,  or  illness  and   disease,  and  these  should  be  set  out  with  reference  to  documentary  evidence  where  possible.

Additional information

If applicable, please  state any additional information which you think is relevant and supportive to your application or which you think has not been covered adequately in this form.

This is a good opportunity to do precisely that!

  

 

 

A rough guide to the online application form for City law firms



Here are some ideas about how to tackle those common online applications for training contracts and vacation scheme placements.

Activities, interests, positions of responsibility

Please give brief details of your key non-academic extra-curricular hobbies, activities, leisure interests, highlighting any positions of responsibility whether at school, university or otherwise.

This question is trying to assess how you manage your time. What have you been or are you doing whilst studying at university or Law School? If you are involved with any sporting or charity work tell them all about it – be specific. Talk about what you have done, what contribution that has made and what you gained from your involvement. These activities provide opportunities to develop skills that will be useful at work and your response should show that you understand this. A simple list of things that look good is less important than offering evidence of what you’ve gained from them. If possible, show how your interests have developed your skills, for example in teamwork, business awareness, or communication.  Try to show results in terms of objectives set and achieving improvements. These sections are often quite tight, so some say it’s permissible to provide an answer in note form.

Prizes

Please provide details of any academic prizes, distinctions, skills, scholarships and any other noteworthy achievements. In the case of skills please specify level of proficiency.

Sometimes the question will specify which “level” of your education these refer to, e.g. school, college or university.

Firm specification

Please explain why you think you are well suited to [], and have chosen to apply to [] for a training contract or vacation scheme placement? why you think you would make a successful trainee?

 [X] is a leading UK law firm. How do you think we are distinct from other law firms?

All [X] trainee solicitors are based in our [Y] office. Please give your reasons for choosing to live in or around and train at the [Y] office.

Again this question is trying to determine your commitment to a career and specifically your commitment to their particular law firm. Recruiters look for motivation, commitment and enthusiasm. So, why have you chosen them? Is it because you have spoken to trainees and like the sound of the firm’s working environment? Have you researched their work and found a specific case / area interesting? Do you have relevant industrial experience? Do you have a language or are from a country that they have clients / offices in? Is there something particular about their training that appeals to you? Show that you have done your research about the firm and that you are genuinely interested in them.

Despite the temptation to apply for as many different corporates as possible, it turns out from http://www.cvmailuk.com/user/main.cfm?rcd=160922 that law students do extensive research in fact into their choice of firm. The 2010 CVmailUK survey indeed provided these as the top ways in which law students ‘did their research’:

  • Firm website (17.6%)
  • LawCareers.net (12.4%)
  • Training Contract Handbook (11.7%)
  • Lex100 (10.4%)
  • Chambers and Partners Students Guide (10.4%)

It’s also worth noting that @AllaboutCareers and @Allaboutlaw are also very helpful. LawCareers.Net and @AllAboutCareers also post the latest deadlines for training contract and vacation scheme placements on their websites. Some firms, such as @Eversheds, run a very active account such as @legaltrainee where law students are able to interact with a current trainee, to get an idea of the organisational structure, culture and training of that firm.

Career motivation

What qualities do you think you possess to be a successful lawyer at [X]? Which areas of law interest you and why?

This question tries to determine your commitment to a career in law: the thinking and research you have done about the profession and what you want from a career as a lawyer. Can you demonstrate enough commitment and interest in law to persuade the firm to invest money and time in you for the Graduate Diploma in Law, Legal Practice Course and/or training contract? This may seem an obvious question but do you really know why you want to be a solicitor or barrister – think hard about it, this may be asked at interview. Be specific in your reasons for choosing a legal career. Have you had any relevant work experience that has helped you to see first hand what a lawyer actually does? Have you had any personal experience of the work of a lawyer – perhaps through family or friends? Even if you have done pro bono in a law centre or a CAB, has this experience been useful in you understanding generic skills such as teamwork, communication or meeting deadlines? Has your law course or degree furthered your interest and commitment to law? Have you developed a substantial interest in access-to-justice? Have you had any relevant experience that has developed skills that would be easily transferable to a career as a lawyer?

Commercial awareness

Identify a current commercial article that you read or a recent event from the business world which has attracted your attention recently. Why do you consider it to be significant? Who are the key stakeholders in this situation and what are the implications for those concerned?

 Business acumen and commercial awareness are important elements to becoming a successful solicitor. Please outline, in your opinion, why you think this would be important and tell us about a time when you’ve demonstrated your abilities in this area. What was the occasion and what impact did possessing this awareness have over the final outcome?

Choose a sector group of the firm and summarise the biggest challenges and opportunities they will face in the future.

Commercial awareness is something that firms almost without exception mention as a desirable quality. Commercial awareness is generally defined as a candidate’s general knowledge of business. It can be summed up as an interest in business and an understanding of the wider environment in which an organisation operates: its customers and competitors. For corporates, this is about establishing “competitive advantage”, and it’s often interesting to work out how companies enter new markets (especially the BRIC emerging economies), and what barriers there might be for companies competing effectively in critical markets.

Commercial awareness generally means an understanding of a client’s business and the industry or sector in which it operates. It is a key competency for applicants. It involves not only keeping up to date with commercial issues and it is also about being able to demonstrate commercial awareness through any business/work experience and, specifically, the applicant’s understanding of the type of firm to which they are applying. Clients seek business solutions, presented in a way that makes sense. An understanding that a law firm operates in a competitive industry is also considered as being commercially aware.

As a result you may be expected to demonstrate an understanding as to how the firm markets itself to its clients. To know who the firm’s main competitors are. To explain how you would attract a potential client by explaining the unique selling points of the firm. For example, if you’re applying to a foreign firm, it’s not inconceivable you could be asked who the major players are in that particular market (e.g. the US market). In addition to this you will be expected to know about the practice areas in which the firm or chambers operate and to be aware of key changes in legislation and the economic market which may affect the way in which they operate.

Have you done a LL.M. in international commercial law where you might have gained important experience in drafting or case analysis in this particular field of law? A LL.M. can teach you a lot of basic international corporate law, practical drafting and commercial research case analysis skills. Have you even done a M.B.A. where you have studied business management in great detail? You could also think about participating in any student societies where you are doing the GDL or LPC – these are very active the vast majority of “learning providers”.

Mention any business/commercial experience you have had, including non-legal work and/or roles which involve dealing with clients or members of the public. Have you ever been a Director of a private limited company yourself? This can highlight your awareness of customer needs and expectations. Were you ever given the task of improving a current service or product? Did you add value to it? If so, how did you go about it, what factors did you have to take into consideration? Are you able to identify the long term and short term goals of an organisation or a project? Thinking in terms of a SWOT (the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of the firm or legal sector, or PESTEL, can be helpful.

Did you have a key role in any society committees at school or university? Were you given a financial role? Any of these can be good indicators that you have had to think about different perspectives in the market place.

Have you ever raised money for a charity, secured sponsorship for a key event? What process did you go through to secure the funds? ?Read the business press regularly. Try to know something about current leading stories/issues, and how they might have an impact on the firm’s clients. Look out for stories that will affect the firm to which you are applying, or its clients, directly or indirectly.

Look at the BBC news and business website. Read also publications like the Financial Times, the Economist, and The Lawyer. There are business related programmes on BBC Radio which are also available to listen again on-line and as podcasts such as:

The Bottom Line (with @EvanHD) http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/bottomline  “Insight into business from the people at the top. Evan Davis meets influential business leaders for a round table conversation about the issues that matter to their companies and their customers.”

www.lawcareers.net/Information/BurningQuestion/Introduction.aspx

http://targetjobs.co.uk/law-solicitors/articleview-48s_20a_2733.aspx

www.wikijob.co.uk

www.guardian.co.uk/business

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law

www.realworldmagazine.com/law

www.thelawyer.com

www.legalweek.com

www.lawyer2B.com

Proactivity

 Describe an occasion when you spotted an opportunity to make an improvement in ‘going the extra mile’, and took action without being asked to do so. What steps did you take? What was the outcome? Explain why you think this attribute is relevant for a solicitor.

This question is testing your problem solving ability. Detail what the issue was, why it was difficult and then what you did to resolve it. If you are talking about a group activity, do not put ‘we’ – they are interested in what you did. As with all your answers use this question to differentiate yourself i.e. make it personal and substantiate what you say with specific examples.

Aspects of a good answer might be as follows.

  • Use initiative to act on opportunities. Become a leader before other people view you as one. Healthy organisations often reward those who take the lead, not just those with formal management roles.
  • Take responsibility for own objectives: set priorities. Display a “can do” attitude even in demanding situations. Try to solve problems, rather than to pass them on to other people.
  • Go the extra mile” when asked to do tasks. Go beyond your job description. Do work that gets you noticed. Show enthusiasm: this will be noticed and you will eventually be rewarded.
  • Take ownership of problems: anticipate potential problems, take pre-emptive action and act quickly to resolve problems. Develop innovative practices. Value innovative thinking.
  • Learn new skills that will enhance capability.

 Flexibility

Describe a time that you have had to change your approach to a project or task halfway through. What changes did you have to make? Why did you need to make these changes? What was the outcome?

This means that you are able to modify your approach to achieve a goal, and you are open to change and new information; you can rapidly adapt to new information, changing conditions, or unexpected obstacles. Legal recuiters are often looking for the following aspects.

1. Values need for flexibility:

  • Accepts that other people’s points of view are reasonable or valid.
  • Acknowledges that people are entitled to their opinions, and accepts that they are different.
  • Steps into colleagues’ tasks when needed or required.

2. Demonstrates flexibility:

  • Works creatively within standard procedures to fit a specific situation.
  • Understands policies and can work within them to meet office, work group, team or individual goals.

3. Adapts approach:

  • Changes one’s approach as required to achieve intended outcomes.
  • Prioritises actions effectively in order to respond to numerous, diverse challenges and demands.

4. Adapts strategy:

  • Changes the overall service plan and implements new practices when original approach and assumptions are no longer valid.
  • Able to shift strategic focus and activities quickly in response to changing organizational priorities.

Teamwork

Teamwork is considered crucial to functioning well as a trainee/junior in a corporate law firm.

 Please give an example of a situation where you were required to work in a team to accomplish an important objective and describe your role in achieving this objective

A law student who is good at teamwork might:

  • Believe that working together with others or in teams gives higher synergies to self and the teams, and therefore is positive and enthusiastic about teamwork and team building.
  • Contributes significantly when working as a member of a team or when working as a team leader to build a strong team; respects all the members of the team and cooperates with every team member and the team leader.
  • Provides help and support to those team members who are in need of help and support, and shares relevant knowledge and information with all the team members including the team leader.
  • Maintains the required level of communication in terms of quality, quantity and timeliness with the team members and the team leader.
  • When working as a team leader, facilitates developing team goals with team members’ participation.
  • Motivates the team members while working as a leader of the team or even when working as a member of the team, building up high team morale; creates a sense or feeling of cohesiveness among the fellow members.
  • Is good at resolving the conflicts that might arise due to diverse personalities of various team members.
  • When the members seem to err from the shared mission, goals and priorities, brings them back on the desired focus.
  • Seeks for each and every member’s active and enthusiastic participation all the time and accordingly motivates the members who seem to be getting disinterested or tuned out from time to time.
  • Makes every member feel that each one’s work or contribution is equally important.
  • Shares credit for success of team with all the others in the team.
  • Celebrates the team’s success together with all the others in the team.
  • Makes sure that the various teams do not become islands in themselves and form unnecessary boundaries around them.

Defining qualities of the candidate

What can you tell us about yourself that sets you apart from other applicants, and which are convincing reasons why we should recruit you?

In a sense, your answer to this question is to some extent governed by your personal qualities not covered elsewhere in the form. Here are some further competences which might be relevant here.

Integrity

A trainee will be expected to upholds the principles of the current SRA Code of Conduct. Some aspects might include:

  • Holds to a laudable value structure all the time and in all the situations.
  • Practices integrity while dealing with everyone and therefore is regarded as trustworthy person.
  • Does not turn and twist the information to gain something or to score a point in an underhand manner.
  • Uses confidential information confidentially. Does not divulge the confidential information even under any body’s pressure.
  • Does not indulge in any kind of corruption or corrupt practices.
  • Motivates others to practice integrity by being an example to others.

Leadership

Some aspects might include:

  • Can envision the advancement and growth opportunities.
  • Possesses abilities for high degree of conceptualization, strategizing and analysis.
  • Demonstrates high achievement orientation. Therefore, emphasizes commitment, accountability, action orientation and results.
  • Adept at interpersonal relationships and puts emotional intelligence in action.
  • Excellent communicator.
  • Uses his excellent influencing skills for bringing out the desired consensus, decisions and actions.
  • Very good at decision making processes and once decisions are reached, displays firmness and decisiveness in implementation.
  • Displays required flexibility and adaptability in different situations and times.
  • Is great team builder and team player. Provides necessary support and cooperativeness.
  • Possesses high commercial awareness and business acumen.
  • Develops many next line leaders.

[There are other competences discussed in this factsheet which might be relevant to this question as well.]

Communication skills

 All solicitors at [X] work with a wide range of people so need to be able to persuade, influence and display effective communication skills. Describe a situation when you have had to communicate effectively.

You should think of various forms of effective communications, e.g. oral presentations, written papers, written papers, drafting, interviewing or advising (on the LPC), practical legal research (on the LPC), blogging, participating in podcasts, and how you have adapted your method of communication according to the target audience. Your answer is bound to be more compelling if you can give concrete examples. Some related specific competences are given as below.

Persuasion

One scenario where persuading skills can be important is the job interview, but the following tips are valuable in many other settings.

  • Focus on the needs of the other party. Take time to listen to them carefully and find out about their interests and expectations. This shows that you are really interested in them and they are then more likely to trust and respect you. It will also make it easier for you to outline the benefits of your proposal in terms they understand.
  • Argue your case with logic. Do careful research on your ideas and those of your competitors (if there are any) and make sure that any claims you make can be verified.
  • Use positive rather than negative language: instead of saying “You’re wrong about this”, say “That’s true but ….”, “That’s an excellent idea, but if we look more deeply …..” or “I agree with what you say but have you considered ….”.

Listening

 Some aspects might include:

  • Believes that listening strengthens the quality of communication, interpersonal relations, human relations, emotional intelligence, conflict management and team management.
  • Every interaction requires one to respond and since the quality of response depends on the quality of listening, tries to improve quality of his listening constantly.
  • Thus, listens to understand the other person and not just to react, reply, control or manipulate the other person. By understanding the other person properly, can respond or act in the best possible manner.
  • Generally respects other people and demonstrates openness and trust through his body language and spoken words.
  • Then, paves way to influencing the people in right directions by diagnosing the issues and concerns of others in a better way for effective problem solving.
  • Promotes a more participative style of managing by involving people.

Conflict and pressure

The success of [X] is built on the self-motivation and applied effort of all its employees, as demonstrated by their ability to work through setbacks coping effectively with conflict and pressure. Describe a situation when you have had to deal with conflict and pressure. Which other people involved? What did you learn about yourself?

Some aspects might include the observations that the law student:

  • Recognises the fact that conflicts are quite natural in any organization and yet these need appropriate redressing to move on with apt solutions, thereforeis willing to take up the responsibility of managing and resolving the conflict.
  • Can think through clearly in a conflicting situation.
  • Keeps his eyes constantly on the desired goals and therefore, does not drift away from them despite conflicting arguments and points of views.
  • Listens well and patiently all the conflicting arguments and presentations.
  • Controls the people and their communication patterns in the discussions that takes place when resolving a conflict.
  • Facilitates the innovative and creative thinking of the people caught up in the conflict.
  • Does not take sides of any particular set of people or their thinking. Rather, tries to facilitate working out genuinely appropriate and optimal solutions.
  • Contributes his own inputs, ideas, creativity and analysis to supplement the missing or erroneous information and thus uncover the real issues and reasons that led to the conflict. Then proceeds to help find the answers.
  • Gains agreements without leaving behind any bitter taste or disrupting the human relationships.
  • Is proactive and as far as possible anticipates the conflicting situations and dissolves them well before they turn into conflicts.

Commitment to excellence

 Describe an occasion when you have demonstrated commitment to a task or project that resulted in you exceeding expectations either for yourself or others. What steps did you take? What was the outcome?

You will be able to achieve the excellence in any skill or competency only if you rehearse or practice the learned skill a large number of times. Knowledge alone is no guarantee for achieving great levels in skills or competencies. For example, only if you start swimming, you will become a swimmer; mere knowledge of swimming or great theories of swimming will not automatically make you even an ordinary swimmer. Knowledge surely helps and is a must but without doing, it is of no use to you. Implementation of knowledge is the name of the game. Wisdom is in knowing what to do and how to do but the virtue is doing it.

It’s said that you should become both consciously and unconsciously competent in your strive for excellence. Consciously competent means gaining the knowledge about the skill to be mastered and begin practicing the knowledge gained (example: gaining knowledge on how to swim using proper styles of swimming and start swimming using the right styles of swimming). On the other hand, unconsciously competent means keep practicing the knowledge gained till you gain mastery in the skill (example: you have now become an expert swimmer since you have been swimming using the proper styles of swimming over number of hours and you can now give yourself 9 on 10 or even 10 on 10). For greater success in life, you should try to reach the unconsciously competent level in the skills required by you for your professional, personal, family and social activities/tasks/projects.

Personal challenge

 Describe a significant challenge that you have faced outside of your academic studies ideally from the last 2 years. How did you initially analyse the challenge? What approach did you take to solving it? What did you learn from this challenge?

Successful answers to these sorts of questions need to be as concrete as possible. Supply specific detail on the situation, the actions taken and the results achieved. Figures can be particularly useful in this context.Your example need not be “big”. Go for something you genuinely believe to be a real achievement rather than give them something you think they want to hear – it’ll be more convincing. The important thing is to set it in context. Explain why it was significant to you – if you’re unsporty, uncoordinated and broke your leg six months previously, learning to stay upright while sliding a few hundred metres downhill may well have been a major achievement. A useful device is the Trojan horse technique, which allows you to smuggle in other examples as in “ I considered selecting one of several achievements, including x and y. However I have chosen z because…….”

 Aspects of a convincing answer might include the following.

1. Recognises Lack of Success:

Acknowledges areas where expectations are not met, and provides reasons which may or may not involve self.

2. Remains Positive:

Re-energises after loss or failure or after encountering a significant hurdle to readdress the situation and to overcome it; approaches new situations with continuing positive outlook, despite previous disappointments.

3. Takes Responsibility:

Acknowledges personal responsibility for outcomes, even when not all elements of a situation are within direct control but could have been personally managed.

4. Learns from Mistakes and Successes:

Analyses situations on an ongoing basis to improve own performance; designs a personal action plan to address own issues constructively and decisively.

5. Shares Learning with Team:

Deals openly with failure by bringing team together to define specific problems and present solutions; may involve team in diagnosis and in developing solutions to effectively transfer knowledge into the organisation.

Mitigating circumstances

Are there any important mitigating circumstances why you feel the exam results you have listed do not fully reflect your abilities?

There may be good reasons why you ‘underperformed’, due to recent bereavement, or illness and disease, and these should be set out with reference to documentary evidence where possible.

 

Preface to Book 2 by Legal Recruit : situational judgement tests



Book 2 “300 online situational judgement test questions for law firm applications” has now been published. This Book is a companion to a brand new innovative website, Legal Recruit, designed to boost the chances of law students applying for training contracts and vacation placements pursuant to online psychometric testing. Legal Recruit is an independent project of mine, and aligns with my ambition to make legal education, training and opportunities fair for students with disabilities. The platform offers features for students with visual impairments and/or reading difficulties. The Preface to the book is reproduced below.

Legal recruiters are concerned that applicants make a good cultural fit with the organisation they are hoping to join. Corporates, including corporate law firms, have a very clear idea about what competences they are looking for, and there is a surprising degree of agreement in their shared values in achieving profitability.  Good recruitment works well, for both the candidate and the firm, but a lot can go wrong in the process.  This book consists of 80 situational judgement brand-new questions.

Ideally, recruitment should be exploring which candidate has the most potential to fit into the organisational structure and culture of that firm, but too often it ends up being a case of ‘damage limitation’. The utilisation of this approach is most dangerous for firms which aim to encourage innovation or entrepreneurship, as many firms in the City claim to be.

Resources on the Legal Recruit platform

Legal Recruit is a brand new, innovative platform to help candidates for corporates, including law firms, shine in their application process. It is found at http://www.legal-recruit.org

Although it has in mind GDL and LPC students applying for training contracts or vacation placements, the tests do not assess actual legal knowledge. While verbal reasoning tests vary somewhat, the verbal reasoning test on the Legal Recruit platform involve questions of the ‘TRUE’, ‘FALSE’ or ‘CANNOT SAY’ variety often experienced by law students as applicants. You can actually take a full-length verbal reasoning test, and immediately on its completion you will get a free, confidential report providing a total mark as well as an item-by-item breakdown. The situational judgement tests, while often referring to corporate law scenarios for trainees, test important competences for all trainees in corporate ifrms. Legal Recruit has a number of resources which will help you improve in your performance on online psychometric tests, or help to demystify what they are about. The platform also allows to practice online verbal reasoning tests and situational judgement tests.

 Playing the system

It is vital for the candidate to know ‘how to play the system’, what his or her motivation in applying for certain types of firms. Corporate law firms often look for relevant work experience, evidence of key competences on the application form, and a reasonable degree (usually II.1 or higher). The vast majority of these firms will make you do some sort of psychological assessment, whatever your actual proven academic ability. You should consider carefully whether the corporate firm where you want to apply takes such tests seriously, and consider whether you wish to apply there. If you do, it is worth getting good at them, as often they will look at the results before considering whether to invite you to interview or not. Psychological assessments vary, and not all are indeed accreditated by the British Psychological Society (BPS). The BPS upholds standards in psychological assessments, and it is well worth looking at their website, which contains a gamut of useful advice and guidelines (http://www.psychtesting.org.uk/).

You are advised to examine carefully the advice for each stage of the recruitment process for your chosen firm, and good luck. It is claimed by recruiters that performance on such tests mirror your ability to do the job; that past performance is a good indicator for future performance; whether this is actually true or not is an intense area of debate, but ensure that you know how best to come across in their specific recruitment process. It might be worth seeing if you can obtain a one-to-one with the careers advisor in your law school, who will be able to steer you through the complexities of the online application form, to online assessments and interviews.

It is worth speaking to the Careers Unit in your law school about how to tackle the application form. The online application form contains lots of subtle points, and it may be worth being aware of them before you fill it in, e.g. http://legal-aware.org/2011/07/law-careers-how-to-write-a-good-training-contract-application-form/

 What are “psychometric tests”?

 

Psychological assessments can be partly used to assess the suitability of law students for a corporate law job. Intelligent recruiters will however not base their decision to invite you for interview on them solely, and they will often freely admit to this if or when you meet them. Any assessments are supposed to be developed using some very technical and complex procedures in order to ensure that they really do measure what they claim to measure and that they do so with a reasonable degree of accuracy.

Most online psychological assessments are designed to be carried out in a formal and standard manner. You should ensure “the basics”, for example, that the room is comfortable, well lit, nicely ventilated, and ‘free from interruptions’. Such ‘standardisation’ ensures that everyone who takes the test is given the same information and the same opportunities. It is argued that the results of the test can be used to place individuals in order of ability, to indicate individual qualities in relation to the entire group of applicants.

The purpose of testing involved in the testing process should be clearly communicated to you in the application process. The purpose of testing in the entire application process should be communicated to you by the law firm, together with what the law firm is going to do with the results once the test is completed. The descriptions of the tests should be clearly provided, and you should have a very careful look at any examples. It is assumed that the test chosen by the recruiter bears some relation, at least, to the skills that might be needed at your chosen law firm as a trainee, to complete the requirements of your training contract.

What can I do to practice beforehand?

Most test publishers provide practice materials that are similar in form and content to the actual tests. You should be notified well in advance of the test session as to whether practice materials are available. For some online tests, you are likely to be exposed to the practice questions shortly before you do the actual test, and you may be able to time the actual test after you had proper time to consider the practice questions. This depends on the competence of the recruitment department of your corporate law firm.

 The British Psychological Society’s Code of Good Practice for Psychological Testing states that:

 People who use psychological assessments are expected by the British Psychological Society to: Ensure that all test takers are well informed and well prepared for the test session, and that all have had access to practice or familiarization materials where appropriate.

If you are taking a test, and the tester sends out practice materials as recommended by best practice guidelines, you should have a look at these sample materials very carefully. Do not just check to see that you have the correct answer to the practice questions, but ask yourself ‘Why is this the correct answer and how did I work that out?’ The practice materials are developed to give the candidate familiarity with the kinds of thinking that they will have to use in the testing session so this will be time well spent.

 How are individual with disabilities treated?

The British Psychological Society’s Code of Good Practice for Psychological Testing states clearly that:

 People who use psychological assessments in settings are expected by the British Psychological Society to: Give due consideration to factors such as gender, ethnicity, age, disability and special needs, educational background and level of ability in using and interpreting the results of tests.

If you or your dependant has a disability and feel that you may need special conditions, it is important that this is brought to the notice of the person responsible for the testing as soon as the testing session has been arranged. This will give maximum time for the assessor to check what special requirements can be provided and what arrangements can be made.

This book

 This book contains 80 practice situational judgement questions (SJTs). The ‘correct responses’ have been determined by an analysis of the current law and business corporate management literature, and from real-life responses to these questions by respondents on the @legalaware twitter thread. All the questions and passages are unique to us; we have absolutely no knowledge of the questions used by the actual common test providers.

 Using realistic work-based scenarios that deal with specific issue or problem, learners are presented with three possible solutions – and asked to identify the best of them. Your response to these scenarios might give the law firm a clear indication whether you have the ability to carry out particular tasks and how you might cope in real-life situations. Equally importantly, the scenarios give you an insight into the type of challenges you will face in the constantly changing environment of a busy corporate law firm. You should look carefully of the website of the firm to which you apply. Only some firms set a SJT at all, and the format of the SJT may be different. For example, you might be expected to rank the best to the worst out of four options instead.

What are situational judgement tests?

There has been a small explosion in the research done into ‘situational judgement tests’ (SJT) for employment selection (Weekley and Ployhart, 2006). SJTs present applicants with work-related situations and possible responses to the situations. There are broadly two types of instructions (reviewed by McDaniel et al., 2007). Behavioural tendency instructions ask respondents to identify how they would likely behave in a given situation. Knowledge instructions ask respondents to evaluate the effectiveness of possible responses to a given situation. Tests assessing an individual’s judgement concerning work-related situations have had a long history in the psychological assessment literature (McDaniel et al., 2001). For example, during World War II, Army psychologists attempted to assess the judgement of soldiers (Northrup, 1989). These judgement tests consisted of scenarios with a number of alternative scenarios. Solutions rested on the person’s ability to draw on his common sense, experience, and general knowledge, rather than logical reasoning.

In an influential study by Chan and Schmitt (2002), data from 160 civil service employees were analysed, with a view to demonstrating the validity of the SJT in predicting overall job performance as well as three performance dimensions: task performance (core technical proficiency; problem analysis, written communication, oral communication), motivational contextual performance (job dedication; motivation to perform, motivation to learn, motivation to work hard), and interpersonal contextual performance (interpersonal facilitation; conflict resolution, negotiation, teamwork and co-operation). Chan and Schmitt (2002) also felt that situational judgement tests provided incremental validity over prediction from cognitive ability, personality traits, and job experience.

Previously, Huffcutt and colleagues (2001) had attempted to elucidate the most suitable construct categories Their constructs included mental capability, knowledge and skills, basic personality traits, applied social skills, interests and preferences, organizational fit, and physical attributes. Recently, Christian, Edwards and Bradley (2010) argue that many studies have failed however, to report the constructs actually measured in SJTs. A construct-level focus in the situational judgement test literature is therefore lacking. Christian and colleagues (2001) found that situational judgement tests most often assess leadership and interpersonal skills and those situational judgement tests measuring teamwork skills and leadership skills have relatively high validities for overall performance.

There has been an increasing drive towards standardization of these tasks. For example, the LR SJT has questions in written format. There is inevitably a difference for oral questions, or SJTs in video format (it is claimed that video SJTs have more subtle nuances involving social cognition or emotional intelligence which can be picked upon). Also, the questions can potentially vary in scenario length (longer scenarios tend to have more detail), and how scenarios are profession-specific (for example, type of firm, law/medicine/business). Finally, the questions can vary in format. In the LR SJT, and for example in the 2010 and 2011 Clifford Chance SJT, you have to pick one best out of the options given. In some tests, rather, you may be required to rank your choices in order of preference. To the best of our knowledge, Clifford Chance will not be using the SJT in 2011 recruitment, and the format of the Eversheds SJT is entirely different to that presented in this book and on the Legal Recruit website.

 Competences

Law firms tend to have a very clear idea what they’re looking for. These are called “competences”. ‘Situational judgement tests’ look at competencies.  For more information about competencies which legal recruiters look for, please look at the ‘LegalRecruit’ website page here, http://legal-recruit.org/about-the-tests/competencies/.

The LR situational judgement test focuses on six competences, and there is a chapter devoted to each competence. Please note, however, that you may find that, as in real life, scenarios can cover more than one competence, and you may indeed find some conflicts in the importance of certain competences. Our key competences are problem solving,  a proactive attitude, commitment to excellence, communication and negotiation, teamwork, and attention-to-detail and leadership. In this book, you will get three options for each scenario (A to C), and all you have to do is to pick on. In this book, you will get an explanation for the ‘correct’ answer.

Problem-solving

Do you have the mental agility and intellectual rigour to analyse problems and apply this analysis to develop novel, unexpected solutions? The problems you face can be large or small, simple or complex, and easy or difficult to solve. Regardless of the nature of the problems, a fundamental part of every trainee lawyer’s role is finding ways to solve them. It is therefore felt that being a confident problem solver will really important to your success a trainee lawyer. Much of that confidence comes from having a good process to use when approaching a problem. The four basic steps in problem solving comprise defining the problem, generating alternatives, evaluating and selecting alternatives, and implementing solutions.

Proactive minds

Are you naturally inquisitive with an openness to new ideas and the initiative to turn them into practical results? Initiative is often misunderstood because it is simply not about meeting performance goals or targets; it is often about going the extra mile. Initiative may be about identifying a need and championing a solution for the benefit of the law firm, without being asked to do so. Initiative involves a sense of responsibility for the company’s well-being and a few guiding principles. Initiative is about taking steps to make the law firm better, and not about wasting time tackling unimportant matters. To make the distinction, try determining the impact a certain action would make on your team’s performance, the company’s bottom-line or the company’s long-term vision.

Being proactive means thinking and acting ahead – basically, this means using foresight. It is a great method for avoiding more work down the road but also can be extremely important for averting disasters, planning well for the future and for instituting systems at work, in study, and at home that make life easier for not just you, but others as well.

Commitment to excellence

Do you hold yourself to the highest standards of performance even when the going is tough? And are you passionate about continuously raising and refining your own performance levels? Do you persevere when pursuing a project, but remain flexible if there are obstacles in your way? A ‘commitment to excellence’ is broadly defined to mean that an employee ‘adopts a conscientious and proactive approach to work to achieve and maintain excellent standards’. Every member a corporate law firm must strive to achieve and maintain the highest professional and personal standards, thereby enhancing both the competence and cohesion of that law firm.

It is interesting to have a look at various law firms you know to see how they present their commitment to excellence. There are in fact various ways in which law firms can commit to excellence, and you should search for the term ‘shared values’ on the corporate website. It is interesting in fact to consider how law firms can vary markedly even in their marketing taglines. Many law firms believe that community and social responsibility (corporate social responsibility) involves an understanding of the impact our business has on the environment, the welfare of individuals, the community and the sustainability of the world’s resources. This means that running a business goes beyond making profits and acquiring wealth, and law firms increasingly acknowledge our obligation to consider the wider interests of our clients, employees and the community in which we function. In economic terms, responsible approach in these areas can lead to greater efficiencies, lower costs and an improved reputation as a responsible service provider and employer.

The SRA Handbook sets out the standards and requirements we expect regulated community and trainees to achieve and observe, for the benefit of the clients they serve and in the public interest. Whilst the purpose of a SJT will not be to ‘examine’ you on the Code of Conduct, your compliance with this Code is of course expected at minimum. The SRA’s approach to regulation is outcomes-focused and risk-based, so that clients receive services in a way that best suits their needs. There is more information about this on the LegalAware blog, http://legal-aware.org/2011/12/blogpost-2-out-of-2-in-the-legalaware-series-on-outcomes-focused-regulation/. It is really important that you make every effort to stay in good physical or mental health for our own health and well-being and also as a personal responsibility towards people you work for/with. It is our responsibility to develop our own and others’ professional understanding of how air corporate law is most effectively applied and how it can remain relevant and capable in contemporary environments.

Strong communication skills

Can you communicate fluently, clearly and concisely? Persuade and negotiate with others in both group and individual situations? Make complex information understandable to clients? What will you do if you find there are problems with communication?  Lawyers, it is mooted, frequently fail to treat clients with respect, do not consider the nature of interpersonal relations with clients to be an important aspect of law practice, tend to be motivated more by financial returns than by professional values, are inaccessible and unresponsive, are poor communicators, do not know how to deal with clients effectively, and are sometimes even indifferent to clients’ feelings.

Teamwork

Do you have the confidence to collaborate, seek feedback, share ideas and build credibility through your interaction other people? You might read about the importance of  good teamwork with a focus on areas such as conflict resolution, maximising your contribution, and using ‘small wins’ to motivate other members of your team. Often quoted, Bruce Tuckman’s classic description of the stages of group development is easy to understand and remember, but it helps to go back and look at what’s behind each stage. Tuckman is a respected educational psychologist who first described the (then) four stages of group development in 1965, soon after leaving Princeton.  Looking at the behaviour of small groups in a variety of environments, he recognised the distinct phases they progress through, and suggested they need to experience all four stages before they achieve maximum effectiveness.

Attention-to-detail and leadership

Can you manage your own workload, stay organised under pressure, pay attention to detail and be relied on to complete each task accurately and completely? Corporate law firms need trainees who can handle both the small and large parts of a task. Such individuals will not overlook what needs to be done and can be depended on to do each task accurately and completely.  Proofreading is an example of where attention-to-detail is critical – this is especially important whether you are a medical writer, for example, or a legal draftsman. It’s well worth looking at “top tips” for how you can be a good proofreader, and bear in mind that legal recruiters will go through your application form “with a fine toothcomb” to look for any mistakes. Legal recruiters also are often looking for ‘future leaders’, although they do not give a coherent description of leadership qualities they are looking for. You might find interesting to read about effective leadership styles, or creating a vision, for example.

 Reading difficulty (dyslexia)

Dyslexia can be a legally recognised disability depending on its severity. Therefore, when applicants or candidates are being assessed, the qualified test user should have due regard to the employment provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act (1995) or Equality Act (2010); this makes it unlawful for an employer to treat a disabled person less favourably than a non-disabled person without good reason. Discrimination is outlawed in a wide range of employment activities including selection, promotion and training.

The British Dyslexia Association defines dyslexia as:

‘A combination of abilities and difficulties which affect the learning process in one or more of reading, spelling and writing. Accompanying weaknesses may be identified in areas of speed processing, short-term memory, sequencing, auditory and/or visual perception, spoken language and motor skills. It is particularly related to mastering and using written language, which may include alphabetic, numeric and musical notation.’

In selection for a training contract or vacation placement, an individual with dyslexia In is likely to encounter difficulty with tests of verbal reasoning, spelling and functional literacy. The law requires that accommodations are made for disabled people including those with dyslexia to ensure that selection procedures do not disadvantage them. The employer is concerned with eliciting accurate information on abilities to use in making decisions.

The standardised nature of these tests is one of the main contributors to their effectiveness and objectivity. Arbitrary modifications to the test or administration procedure are likely to invalidate the results and render standard norm groups and score interpretations meaningless. A common modification for individuals with dyslexia is to adjust the timing of the test. However, the amount of extra time required will depend on the way the dyslexia manifests itself, its severity, the test(s) being used and their relationship to the job requirements. Only a relevant professional can determine what is appropriate. Whether adjustments have been made to standard test procedures or not, careful administration can help ensure that individuals with dyslexia have a fair opportunity to demonstrate their skills.

As with many disabilities, stress may exacerbate the impact of dyslexia. Therefore, a calm and understanding approach on the part of the administrator is important.

People with dyslexia may have difficulty with test instructions. This can be due to reading difficulties, or to a difficulty with short-term memory and/or sequencing which is common with dyslexia.

Visual impairments and the law

Visual impairment covers a wide range of conditions. Even a person who is registered blind may have some residual vision, e.g. the ability to discern light from dark or even quite good acuity within a severely limited field of vision. Partial sight also covers many different types of conditions. These can range from very blurred vision to loss of some areas of the field of vision. For some people the act of focusing can be difficult, this can mean that reading difficult, as it is necessary to constantly re-focus on the next portion of text.

A visual impairment may occur alone or in combination with other conditions. Some people are born with visual impairments or have lived with the disability for a long time and have been taught or developed their own strategies for coping with both the practical difficulties of living and dealing with information usually presented in text form. For those with more residual vision, texts are typically accessed using large print and/or various magnification and lighting aids. Aids can include powerful spectacle lenses, free-standing magnifiers placed on top of a text, often with an integral light source.

A person who is registered or certified blind or partially sighted is automatically regarded as disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act (1995). However, even without registration, it is likely that a person with significantly limited vision which is not easily corrected using glasses or contact lenses will be considered disabled under the provisions of the Act.

Impact on testing

Any task where materials are presented visually, whether on paper, computer screen or as objects to be manipulated, will cause difficulty for a visually impaired person. This will include the vast majority of psychometric tests. In order to assess a person with a visual disability, it is likely to be necessary to make adjustments to test administration procedures, use alternative testing materials, or both. However, any changes to a test cannot be made without affecting its reliability and validity.

The standardised nature of psychometric tests is one of the main contributors to their effectiveness and objectivity, and arbitrary modifications to the test or administration procedure are likely to invalidate the results and render standard norm groups and score interpretations meaningless. Some test takers may want to bring along some special equipment or ask for specific lighting conditions.

And finally…

We hope that you enjoy using the test materials in this book, and on the website should you choose to explore it. We are most grateful for any suggestions as how to improve our website, to ensure that we are doing things right: contact us on enquiries@legal-recruit.org, and you should expect to receive a reply within 24-48 hours.

Good luck!

London, December 2011

1st edition 

Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech