Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech

Home » Posts tagged 'online'

Tag Archives: online

Psychometric tests (like the SHL one) for training contract applications – free resources with 11 days left!



Psychometric tests for training contracts are extremely important. Within a week or two of submitting your application form online, your firm will send you a link to an online psychometric test (or two) for you to do strictly under exam conditions on your own. It is critical that this is your own work, and your law firm may even wish you to do a test at their main offices to verify any test result you have reported as having done by yourself.

‘Legal Recruit’ is my relatively new, innovative platform for law students to practice online verbal reasoning test skills in advance of their training contract application. It is nothing to do with BPP, although a small group of us in the student society, the BPP Legal Awareness Society, have designed it from scratch this year. Its location is here.

 

The deadline for the current set of applications is in 13 days’ time from the publication of this blogpost; that is, midnight on the evening of July 31, 2012 (i.e. before August 1, 2012).

You can attempt a full length practice test of 30 questions, requiring answers of either ‘TRUE’, ‘FALSE’ or ‘CANNOT SAY’, similar to the SHL test. You will then get a detailed report on your performance, giving an indication of the %ile in which you would fall based on our sample of 200 graduates who’ve taken the test. All you need is to supply an email that works – you can submit a fake name if you wish, and none of us are able to look up individual performance test scores.

The practice test is situated here; I do not suggest you register for a subscription at this late stage, just look at the free videos and materials on the website which will provide you with a complete explanation of the online verbal reasoning test. We should emphasise that we do not know any of the SHL questions; and the only way to practise SHL questions is to look carefully at their practice materials.

For nearly all firms, you will have to do an online verbal reasoning test within about a week of submitting your online application form. The most common suppliers of this test are SHL and Kenexa, and we hope that practise using the ‘Legal Recruit’ platform will be beneficial.

You might find these free resources useful in preparation of this test:

A factsheet of free worked examples

December 2010 free book of 150 worked examples for online verbal reasoning tests

April 2011 free book of 150 worked examples for online verbal reasoning tests

Book 1 (verbal reasoning) book sample

Book 2 (situational judgement) book sample

Background to online testing

Background to verbal reasoning tests

Background to situational judgement tests

Background to competences (the critical abilities all law firms look for)

Background to difficulties and online assessments

How to complete the online application form for training contract applications

How to write a cover letter for training contract applications

I genuinely wish you the very best of luck for your application! It’s a very important thing to do.

Can you do this online verbal reasoning test question about 'Legal Cheek'?



This would be a typical length of a passage in a verbal reasoning test:

“Legal Cheek” is less than a year old. Its name is a parody of the respected digest of news for the legal community called “Legal Week”. Launched by Alex Aldridge, a law journalist, its posts include a ‘cheeky’ look at legal services, the nature of legal education, and topics of general interest to lawyers and law students. It remains a popular website, and posts are often signposted on their Twitter and Facebook accounts. So far, it has been very wide-ranging. It is said that partners look at it in case they have been mentioned, and it is said that some ‘celebrity’ members of the legal social media community look forward to receiving a name-check. Such a name-check is often a sign of a good status within the social media world of law in the UK.

 

 

(LegalCheek logo (C) LegalCheek 2011/2, original location: http://www.legalcheek.com/)

 

[Length of Passage = 135 words]

So could you do the following questions?

‘Legal Cheek’ was launched by David Allen Green.

FALSE. It says clearly in the second sentence that ‘Legal Cheek’ was launched by Alex Aldridge.

Some ‘celebrity’ members of the legal social media community look forward to receiving a name-check.

CANNOT SAY. The Passage reports that ‘it is said that…’, but the statement itself is neither definitely true or definitely false.

 

Law students unite – and show the law firms that these psychometric tests are very easy!

 

To follow Legal Cheek, please press here for Twitter, and/or Facebook.

Brand new free practice psychometric test worked examples for training contract applications



Pro bono publico is an important strand of many lawyers’ output.

That is why our student society based at BPP is distributing for free this book containing 150 worked examples of psychometric test questions. These questions test verbal reasoning using short passages, and require respondents to decide whether given statements are true or false, or they simply cannot say from the information given. These worked examples are all totally original, and the intellectual property of ‘Legal Recruit’.

These questions are carefully designed to test common competences in verbal reasoning questions. The passages are across a broad range of subjects, ranging from biology to transport. The passages are all of roughly the same length (120 – 140 words).

We should like to stress, as usual, that this product is produced by students at BPP, but otherwise nothing to do with BPP. It is certainly not provided in any capacity by BPP, and students should use the material supplied entirely voluntarily. We have nothing to do with the official Careers Service of any of the teaching sites of BPP Law School. This document (below) is not endorsed by anyone at BPP.

We do not have any test providers in mind when we provide these worked examples, as we hope that the skills you develop in answering them can be transferred to whatever test you do for real. However, it’s advisable to phone up the graduate recruitment team (or email them), to enquire about where (if anywhere) a similar test appears in their application process for a training contract. It could be required at roughly the time of submission of the online application form, or could feature during the ‘assessment day’ (if relevant).

Terms and conditions Please do not distribute this material without permission or acknowledgement, and any sale of this material for commercial gain is strictly prohibited. You may tweet me on @legalaware if you wish to use this material in a specific context, but otherwise the worked examples are provided for personal use. I would be especially interested if you disagree with any of the answers, and I’ll happily consider your argument (and amend the manuscript if necessary.)

Scenarios are based on real news stories which are freely available at the time of writing, but any misrepresentation or similar is completely unintentional. We should be happy to amend any material, if alerted accordingly.

Anyway, on a positive note, I hope that you enjoy using these resources in addition to your usual GDL, LPC, LLB(Hons) or LLM learning materials, and that you approach training contract applications for City firms with due confidence.

To download the free 87-page document containing brand new 150 worked examples, please click here. By clicking, you are deemed to have agreed to the terms and conditions provided above.

Enjoy!

 

Images of samples from this new book

Practice verbal reasoning tests – blogpost 2 (business)



This is second in a daily series of blogposts giving practice at verbal reasoning tests for law students. Everyday we choose a new subject topic. Today it’s business. You may well have to do an online verbal reasoning test (psychometric test) as part of your training contract application.

In a verbal reasoning test, you are usually provided with a passage of information and required to evaluate a set of statements by selecting one of the following possible answers:

A – True (The statement follows logically from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

B – False (The statement is logically false from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

C – Cannot Say (Cannot determine whether the statement is true or false without further information)

In the example below, give your answer to each question by clicking on either A, B or C. You will be told whether your answer is correct or not.

Passage:

Over 60 years ago, evolutionary biologist Bernhard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species such as humans, whereas females outdo them in small-bodied species such as spiders. Now it turns out that many plants obey Rensch’s rule too. Most plants produce both male and female sex organs, but around 7 percent are dioecious, meaning individuals are purely male or female. Recent results provide that female stems also must be large enough to display the fruit and support the animals that spread the pollen or seeds. If metabolism, predators or climate promote the evolution of smaller plants, however, males can shrink because their gametes are smaller. 

The questions might be as follows.

1. Over 80 years ago, Bernard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species.

CANNOT SAY – the passage says that Bernard Rensch calculated this over 60 years ago, but it is not possible to say from the passage whether he calculated this over 80 years ago.

2. Around 7% of plants are dioecious, but it is not necessary for female stems to be large enough to display the fruit.

FALSE – whilst the first part of the statement is true according to the passage, the second part of the statement is clearly false, making the entire statement false.

 

So what’s the best way to prepare for your verbal reasoning test?

You are advised to practice any available good-quality example questions, and any books you can get your hands on with similar questions, and read our advice here. If you prepare properly for your test you will have nothing to worry about. Being prepared and knowing what to expect in your verbal reasoning test will go a long way to helping you perform your best. These verbal reasoning tests used by employers in their selection process aim to measure your ability to read, comprehend and interpret written information. Verbal reasoning tests are designed to test your powers of comprehension and logic.

You will be tested on whether you jump to conclusions or you appreciate the limitations of a statement. If a passage says “it has been reported…” it does not follow that the fact is necessarily true, only that it has been reported. Another classic example is: “if the lights in a house come on, does that mean there is someone inside the building?” Not necessarily.

“If A is bigger than B, does that mean B is small?” Not necessarily. You will be tested to sort fact from inference, a lot like what’s required in a real work environment. You can therefore see why lawyers almost always have to pass a verbal reasoning test.

Through practice, you will develop your own technique for answering verbal reasoning questions to the best of your ability, however for most people the best way to approach them is to read the entire passage through once, then turn to the questions. Read the first statement and refer back to the relevant part of the passage to carefully consider if the statement is true, false, or impossible to determine without further information. It will often come down to just one or two sentences within the passage.

You should have an idea of how much time to allow yourself for each question and know when to move on. Concentration is essential, especially when every second counts.  Base your answers on only the information contained in the passage. This is crucial, and if you don’t do this you will probably get a lot of the questions wrong. Verbal reasoning tests are not tests of what you know, they are tests of how well you understand written information.

 

PASSAGE

Barclays management has suffered a significant revolt by shareholders, after 26.9% of those who voted, said no to the company’s executive pay package. The vote came after Barclays’ chairman, Mr Marcus Aguis, apologised for the firm’s failure to communicate over the issue. His speech at the annual general meeting (AGM) prompted heckles and mocking laughter from shareholders, some of whom have been angered by high pay. It is one of the biggest shareholder rebellions of recent history. Including those abstaining, the result showed 32% of shareholders refused to back the company’s remuneration report. “There is a significant minority of shareholders who feel that we got some of these judgements [on remuneration] wrong for 2011 and that we have not sufficiently taken their views on board,” Mr Agius said at the bank’s annual meeting.

Mr Aguis was speaking at an extraordinary general meeting.

FALSE. Mr Aguis was speaking at an AGM.

The article refers to one of the biggest shareholder rebellions of recent history.

TRUE. This is clearly stated in the fourth sentence of this passage.

 

PASSAGE

Two of the UK’s biggest banks have admitted denying some customers their right to cancel recurring payments. Customers seeking to cancel “continuous payment authorities”  have been told by banks such as Lloyds TSB and Santander that only the Payee can agree such action. Since 2009, banks have been legally required to cancel CPAs when a customer asks. Two different parties are involved, payor and payee. Customer guidance from Lloyds and Santander did not reflect this. The new rights were enshrined in the Payment Services Regulations, which came into force in November 2009, but have been subject to ongoing discussions between the banks and the Financial Services Authority (FSA). As a bank customer, you have the right to cancel one of these continuous payment authorities and you can go to your bank, they can’t put up any hurdles, but in practice, some are being denied this right.

Only the Payor can agree to continuous payment authorities.

FALSE. Only the Payee can agree to such action. The Payor is never the Payee.

In practice, some are being denied the right to cancel one of these continuous payment authorities.

TRUE. This is a clear conclusion from the final two sentences of this Passage.

 

PASSAGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Samsung Electronics has overtaken Nokia to become the world’s largest maker of mobile phones. Nokia took the top spot in 1998 from Motorola, but in the first quarter of 2012 Samsung shipped 93m phones compared to almost 83m by Nokia. Samsung also reported its highest quarterly profit since 2008. Net profit was 5.05tn won ($4.5bn; £2.8bn) in the quarter ending 31 March, up 81% from 2.78tn won last year. Samsung is also the world’s biggest TV and flat screen maker. The firm said its IT and mobile communications division, which manufactures the smartphones, made an operating profit of 4.27tn won during the period, as revenues in the division surged 86% from a year earlier. The Galaxy range has been very popular and helped Samsung overtake Apple to become the world’s biggest seller of smartphones.

Nokia has been the world’s largest maker of mobile phones.

TRUE. This is a correct conclusion from the first sentence.

During the first quarter of 2012, Nokia shipped around 10m phones more than Samsung.

FALSE. The Passage states the opposite in fact.

 

PASSAGE

US carmaker Ford has reported lower quarterly profits following weak sales in Europe and higher tax charges. Ford said about half the drop was due to it paying a higher tax rate. Ford made a loss of $149m in Europe where many economies are struggling. The carmaker’s sales in Europe were down by 60,000. Ford also reported losses in Asia, Africa and South America. However, in North America pre-tax profits rose 17% to $2.1bn, which was its best performance in the region since 2000. The company’s results contrast with others this week from leading car firms. Volkswagen, Daimler, Honda, Hyundai and Chrysler all reported an increase in profits for this quarter. Ford has also been boosting its manufacturing capacity in China, as part of its effort to raise global sales by nearly 50% to about 8 million cars by 2015.

The fall in profits also affected Ford in Europe.

TRUE. This is stated in the third sentence.

Volkswagen reported a decrease in profits for the quarter being discussed.

FALSE. The passage states the opposite in the penultimate sentence.

 

PASSAGE

Lloyds Banking Group (LBG) has said it has ended its exclusivity agreement with the Co-operative Group over the sale of 632 bank branches. The Co-op had entered exclusive talks over the sale of the branches in December, but Lloyds will now also consider talks with rival suitors. Earlier this month, banking venture NBNK put forward a fresh bid proposal for the branches. Lloyds has to sell the branches for regulatory reasons. Lloyds – which is 40%-owned by the government – has a deadline of November 2013 to complete the sale in order to meet European Commission competition rules. Given the renewed interest in the Verde business shown by NBNK, LBG will now consider detailed discussions with other parties but only once LBG is satisfied that any proposal is likely to achieve the appropriate regulatory clearances.

It is optional for LBG to sell these branches.

FALSE. LBG “has to sell the branches for regulatory reasons”.

40% of Lloyds is owned by the Government.

TRUE. This is stated in the Passage.

 

 

(c) All original material Legal Recruit 2012. All rights reserved.

Legal Recruit is an independent initiative and nothing to do with BPP. These materials are provided for personal teaching purposes only from students for other students (see full statement below.)

@legal_recruit has the right to be identified as the author of this publication. All rights reserved. Any unauthorised broadcasting, copying or re-recording (duplication) will constitute an infringement of copyright. Permission granted to reproduce for personal and educational use only. Commercial copying, hiring, lending is prohibited. No further selling of this publication is permitted without the prior consent of the author. Whilst the materials are based on real news stories which have appeared in the media, the author takes no responsibility about the accuracy of the content therein. Any misrepresentation of persons or their work is entirely unintended.

Practice verbal reasoning tests – blogpost 1 (biology)



You may well have to do an online verbal reasoning test (psychometric test) as part of your training contract application.

In a verbal reasoning test, you are usually provided with a passage of information and required to evaluate a set of statements by selecting one of the following possible answers:

A – True (The statement follows logically from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

B – False (The statement is logically false from the information or opinions contained in the passage)

C – Cannot Say (Cannot determine whether the statement is true or false without further information)

In the example below, give your answer to each question by clicking on either A, B or C. You will be told whether your answer is correct or not.

Passage:

Over 60 years ago, evolutionary biologist Bernhard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species such as humans, whereas females outdo them in small-bodied species such as spiders. Now it turns out that many plants obey Rensch’s rule too. Most plants produce both male and female sex organs, but around 7 percent are dioecious, meaning individuals are purely male or female. Recent results provide that female stems also must be large enough to display the fruit and support the animals that spread the pollen or seeds. If metabolism, predators or climate promote the evolution of smaller plants, however, males can shrink because their gametes are smaller. 

The questions might be as follows.

1. Over 80 years ago, Bernard Rensch calculated that males are typically the larger sex in big-bodied species.

CANNOT SAY – the passage says that Bernard Rensch calculated this over 60 years ago, but it is not possible to say from the passage whether he calculated this over 80 years ago.

2. Around 7% of plants are dioecious, but it is not necessary for female stems to be large enough to display the fruit.

FALSE – whilst the first part of the statement is true according to the passage, the second part of the statement is clearly false, making the entire statement false.

 

So what’s the best way to prepare for your verbal reasoning test?

You are advised to practice any available good-quality example questions, and any books you can get your hands on with similar questions, and read our advice here. If you prepare properly for your test you will have nothing to worry about. Being prepared and knowing what to expect in your verbal reasoning test will go a long way to helping you perform your best. These verbal reasoning tests used by employers in their selection process aim to measure your ability to read, comprehend and interpret written information. Verbal reasoning tests are designed to test your powers of comprehension and logic.

You will be tested on whether you jump to conclusions or you appreciate the limitations of a statement. If a passage says “it has been reported…” it does not follow that the fact is necessarily true, only that it has been reported. Another classic example is: “if the lights in a house come on, does that mean there is someone inside the building?” Not necessarily.

“If A is bigger than B, does that mean B is small?” Not necessarily. You will be tested to sort fact from inference, a lot like what’s required in a real work environment. You can therefore see why lawyers almost always have to pass a verbal reasoning test.

Through practice, you will develop your own technique for answering verbal reasoning questions to the best of your ability, however for most people the best way to approach them is to read the entire passage through once, then turn to the questions. Read the first statement and refer back to the relevant part of the passage to carefully consider if the statement is true, false, or impossible to determine without further information. It will often come down to just one or two sentences within the passage.

You should have an idea of how much time to allow yourself for each question and know when to move on. Concentration is essential, especially when every second counts.  Base your answers on only the information contained in the passage. This is crucial, and if you don’t do this you will probably get a lot of the questions wrong. Verbal reasoning tests are not tests of what you know, they are tests of how well you understand written information.

 

PASSAGE

New evidence shows that A-levels, examined in England, in a range of subjects don’t equip students with an appropriate level of mathematical skills. Also, different exam boards have recently been shown to provide varying levels of mathematical difficulty. As a result, a number of learned societies, has made recommendations for the upcoming A-level reform. SCORE (Science Community Representing Education), a collaboration of leading science organisations, publishes a new report today, Friday 27 April. This analyses the type, extent and difficulty of mathematics within the 2010 A-level exams for the three sciences. The report consider whether the type of mathematics in the examinations was suitable for progression within the subject’s field, the proportion of the examination that depended on mathematical knowledge, and the complexity of the mathematical questions. An expert claimed that these reports are extremely worrying, and we will be working hard to help improve the standard and relevance of A-levels.

Question 1. A-levels are a new exam.

CANNOT SAY. No information is given about when A-levels were first introduced in England.

QUESTION 2. This report considered mathematics in A-level examinations in Chemistry, Physics and Biology.

CANNOT SAY. The article does not specify which three sciences were studied in the report.

 

PASSAGE

Berries are good for you, that’s no secret. But can strawberries and blueberries actually keep your brain sharp in old age? A new study by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital finds that a high intake of flavonoid rich berries, such as strawberries and blueberries, over time, can delay memory decline in older women by 2.5 years.  The research team used data from subjects from the Nurses’ Health Study who completed health and lifestyle questionnaires beginning in 1976. Findings show that increased consumption of blueberries and strawberries was associated with a slower rate of memory decline in older women. A greater intake of anthocyanidins and total flavonoids was also associated with reduced memory decline. Researchers observed that women who had higher berry intake had delayed memory decline by up to 2.5 years.

Question 3. Berries which are high in flavonoids include blueberries.

TRUE. This is indeed specified in the third sentence of the passage.

QUESTION 4. Consumption of blueberries is associated with a faster rate of memory decline in older women.

CANNOT SAY. It is not possible to make this claim, for certain, from this passage.

 

 

PASSAGE

A research team at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden has succeeded in describing the structure and function of the outermost layer of the skin – the “stratum corneum” – at a molecular level. This opens the way not only for the large-scale delivery of drugs via the skin, but also for a deeper understanding of skin diseases. The upper layer of the skin is a watertight barrier called the stratum corneum. They have now structure determined this barrier layer at a molecular level, unlocking the secrets of the skin’s perviousness. This will hopefully enable the widespread administration of drugs though the skin instead of via pills or injections, which brings several advantages; for example, it means that drugs can be delivered evenly over time instead of in doses.

Question 5. The structure and function of the ‘stratum corneum’ had never been elucidated at a molecular level.

CANNOT SAY. Whilst a research team at Karolinska Institutet has succeeded in describing these recently, the article does not state whether this is a new discovery.

Question 6. Medications through the skin will become more common.

CANNOT SAY. The article states clearly that such medications ‘will hopefully’ become available.

 

PASSAGE

A team reveals that playing an action videogame, even for a relatively short time, causes differences in brain activity and improvements in visual attention.  Previous studies have found differences in brain activity between action videogame players and non-players, but these could have been attributed to pre-existing differences in the brains of those predisposed to playing videogames and those who avoid them. This is the first time research has attributed these differences directly to playing video games. Twenty-five subjects — who had not previously played videogames — played a game for a total of 10 hours in one to two hour sessions. Subjects who played the shooter videogame and also showed the greatest improvement on the visual attention task showed significant changes in their brain activity. The remaining subjects — including those who had played the puzzle game — did not.

Question 7.  The improvements in visual attention are caused by differences in brain activity.

CANNOT SAY. No statement about causality of these processes is mentioned in this passage.

Question 8. The average length of time spent per session, for most subjects, was 5.

CANNOT SAY. It is not possible to make this statement from the information provided.

 

PASSAGE

They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. Fortunately, this is not always true. Our brain processes information in complex networks of nerve cells. The cells communicate and excite one another through special connections, called synapses. Young brains are capable of forming many new synapses, and they are consequently better at learning new things. That is why we acquire vital skills – walking, talking, hearing and seeing – early on in life. The adult human brain stabilises the synapses so that we can use what we have learned in childhood for the rest of our lives. Earlier research found that approximately one fifth of the synapses in the brain inhibit rather than excite other nerve-cell activity. Neuroscientists have now shown that many of these inhibitory synapses disappear if the adult brain is forced to learn new skills.  

Synapses are found in complex networks of nerve cells.

TRUE. This statement is clearly true, on the basis of information given in the first two sentences.

Approximately 80% of synapses in the human brain excite other nerve-cell activity.

CANNOT SAY. Approximately 80% of synapses – in total – either excite other nerve-cell activity, or have no effect on their nerve-cell activity.

 

(c) All original material Legal Recruit 2012. All rights reserved.

Legal Recruit is an independent initiative and nothing to do with BPP.

@legal_recruit has the right to be identified as the author of this publication. All rights reserved. Any unauthorised broadcasting, copying or re-recording (duplication) will constitute an infringement of copyright. Permission granted to reproduce for personal and educational use only. Commercial copying, hiring, lending is prohibited. No further selling of this publication is permitted without the prior consent of the author. Whilst the materials are based on real news stories which have appeared in the media, the author takes no responsibility about the accuracy of the content therein. Any misrepresentation of persons or their work is entirely unintended.

Answering an online verbal reasoning question: a topical example



Here is a passage for you to consider!

U.K. unemployment rose by 48,000 to 2.67 million in the three months to the end of December 2011, according to official figures published today. The unemployment rate was 8.4%, the Office for National Statistics said, the highest for 16 years. The number of young people without a job rose 22,000 to 1.04m, taking the unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds to 22.2%. The number of people claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance in January increased by 6,900 to 1.6 million. While the unemployment rate is now at its highest since 1995, the number of job vacancies rose to 476,000 in the three months to January. A government minister stated that there are signs of stability. An opposition spokesman, however, suggested that today’s figures make for grim reading for the millions of squeezed families desperate for good news on the economy.

This passage would be reasonable simply as a test of verbal reasoning skills by some test providers. It does not contain overly complicated English, and has a total sentence length of 137 words. It possibly wouldn’t be used in a real assessment as it is on a political subject, and online verbal reasoning tests tend to avoid political topics. I would like it to explain the reasoning behind how a passage might be used to test verbal reasoning, however.

Have a go at getting inside the mindset of the world of verbal reasoning! Read each of the sentences, and make up your mind about one of three alternatives.

True means the statement follows logically given the information contained within the passage.?False means the statement cannot logically follow given the information contained within the passage.? Cannot Say means you are not given enough information in the passage to decide.

The key to all of these is you must consider ONLY the information given in the passage. In answering the test, you are advised not to take anything for granted, and do not make unjustified assumptions. This is critically important, especially if you do have background knowledge and/or experience of the subject matter in hand.

More than 3 million were unemployed in the UK on 31 December 2011, according to official figures published today.

FALSE. This is a direct contradiction of the sentence in the first sentence.

The total number of people currently unemployed is the highest it has been for 16 years.

CANNOT SAY. Whilst it is stated that the rate is the highest for 16 years, this does not necessarily mean that the total number of unemployed is the highest it has been for 16 years. This is a classic trap used by designers of online verbal reasoning tests, to see whether you’ve picked up on the word ‘rate’ in the passage. Furthermore, the information given in the passage is given according to the official Office for National Statistics figure, but this is not necessarily the actual figure. You should not do these tests using ‘outside knowledge’ at all. As an aside, there has been a rampant debate in the media about whether the official statistics underestimate the true level of unemployment in recent days.

A new way to do practice online psychometric tests by law students for legal recruitment



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Launched in 2011, ‘Legal Recruit’ is an innovative, totally independent, platform for law students to practice online psychometric tests. These tests are routinely provided by SHL Direct and Kenexa to assist in the recruitment of suitable trainees for training contracts and vacation placements in City law firms. ‘Legal Recruit’ only contains unique, original learning material, not available from any learning provider.

This platform therefore will be ideal for any student who needs to complete a psychometric test for his or her own application. It’s usually expected that a candidate scores in a high percentile, and often firms will not call students who do not meet a minimum standard of performance. On the ‘Legal Recruit’, learners receive an immediate report on their performance, included a detailed breakdown of where they did well on individual items and where they got the answer wrong.

The platform offers students a chance to do 15 full-length verbal reasoning tests and 4 situational judgement tests, for £10. However, there is much free material on the site, including a chance to do a practice online verbal reasoning test for free. 76 graduates have so far taken the test and the average score is 21.61. There are lots of free factsheets, including an introduction to psychometric tests, an introduction to verbal reasoning tests, an introduction to situational judgement tests, visual impairments and reading difficulties, how to write a cover sheet, and how to complete the online application form, and lots of exclusive videos too. We hope to launch a numerical reasoning part of the website shortly.

We were very happy when, last month, the ‘Legal Recruit’ was chosen by the Queen Mary and Westfield College (University of London) Law Students’ Union mock ‘assessment day’, for practice by their law students in verbal reasoning and situational judgement tests. This is excellent co-operation between two active law student groups.

The feedback for ‘Legal Recruit’ has been extremely promising, including from current trainees and law students. There is a free book of 150 verbal reasoning questions that anyone can download for free, also containing original unique specimen test material, and 2 books for comprehensive practice at verbal reasoning and situational judgement tests, priced extremely competitively at £7.5o each.

The link to Legal Recruit is here.

It is important to note that, whilst the website is entirely the intellectual property of ‘Legal Recruit’ (an initiative by students in the BPP Legal Awareness Society run by BPP students for BPP students), this project including product is absolutely nothing o do with BPP. The BPP Legal Awareness Society strives to explain the competitive advantage of businesses through law, and to explain compliance with the law in achieving business strategy.

A rough guide to the online application form for City law firms



Here are some ideas about how to tackle those common online applications for training contracts and vacation scheme placements.

Activities, interests, positions of responsibility

Please give brief details of your key non-academic extra-curricular hobbies, activities, leisure interests, highlighting any positions of responsibility whether at school, university or otherwise.

This question is trying to assess how you manage your time. What have you been or are you doing whilst studying at university or Law School? If you are involved with any sporting or charity work tell them all about it – be specific. Talk about what you have done, what contribution that has made and what you gained from your involvement. These activities provide opportunities to develop skills that will be useful at work and your response should show that you understand this. A simple list of things that look good is less important than offering evidence of what you’ve gained from them. If possible, show how your interests have developed your skills, for example in teamwork, business awareness, or communication.  Try to show results in terms of objectives set and achieving improvements. These sections are often quite tight, so some say it’s permissible to provide an answer in note form.

Prizes

Please provide details of any academic prizes, distinctions, skills, scholarships and any other noteworthy achievements. In the case of skills please specify level of proficiency.

Sometimes the question will specify which “level” of your education these refer to, e.g. school, college or university.

Firm specification

Please explain why you think you are well suited to [], and have chosen to apply to [] for a training contract or vacation scheme placement? why you think you would make a successful trainee?

 [X] is a leading UK law firm. How do you think we are distinct from other law firms?

All [X] trainee solicitors are based in our [Y] office. Please give your reasons for choosing to live in or around and train at the [Y] office.

Again this question is trying to determine your commitment to a career and specifically your commitment to their particular law firm. Recruiters look for motivation, commitment and enthusiasm. So, why have you chosen them? Is it because you have spoken to trainees and like the sound of the firm’s working environment? Have you researched their work and found a specific case / area interesting? Do you have relevant industrial experience? Do you have a language or are from a country that they have clients / offices in? Is there something particular about their training that appeals to you? Show that you have done your research about the firm and that you are genuinely interested in them.

Despite the temptation to apply for as many different corporates as possible, it turns out from http://www.cvmailuk.com/user/main.cfm?rcd=160922 that law students do extensive research in fact into their choice of firm. The 2010 CVmailUK survey indeed provided these as the top ways in which law students ‘did their research’:

  • Firm website (17.6%)
  • LawCareers.net (12.4%)
  • Training Contract Handbook (11.7%)
  • Lex100 (10.4%)
  • Chambers and Partners Students Guide (10.4%)

It’s also worth noting that @AllaboutCareers and @Allaboutlaw are also very helpful. LawCareers.Net and @AllAboutCareers also post the latest deadlines for training contract and vacation scheme placements on their websites. Some firms, such as @Eversheds, run a very active account such as @legaltrainee where law students are able to interact with a current trainee, to get an idea of the organisational structure, culture and training of that firm.

Career motivation

What qualities do you think you possess to be a successful lawyer at [X]? Which areas of law interest you and why?

This question tries to determine your commitment to a career in law: the thinking and research you have done about the profession and what you want from a career as a lawyer. Can you demonstrate enough commitment and interest in law to persuade the firm to invest money and time in you for the Graduate Diploma in Law, Legal Practice Course and/or training contract? This may seem an obvious question but do you really know why you want to be a solicitor or barrister – think hard about it, this may be asked at interview. Be specific in your reasons for choosing a legal career. Have you had any relevant work experience that has helped you to see first hand what a lawyer actually does? Have you had any personal experience of the work of a lawyer – perhaps through family or friends? Even if you have done pro bono in a law centre or a CAB, has this experience been useful in you understanding generic skills such as teamwork, communication or meeting deadlines? Has your law course or degree furthered your interest and commitment to law? Have you developed a substantial interest in access-to-justice? Have you had any relevant experience that has developed skills that would be easily transferable to a career as a lawyer?

Commercial awareness

Identify a current commercial article that you read or a recent event from the business world which has attracted your attention recently. Why do you consider it to be significant? Who are the key stakeholders in this situation and what are the implications for those concerned?

 Business acumen and commercial awareness are important elements to becoming a successful solicitor. Please outline, in your opinion, why you think this would be important and tell us about a time when you’ve demonstrated your abilities in this area. What was the occasion and what impact did possessing this awareness have over the final outcome?

Choose a sector group of the firm and summarise the biggest challenges and opportunities they will face in the future.

Commercial awareness is something that firms almost without exception mention as a desirable quality. Commercial awareness is generally defined as a candidate’s general knowledge of business. It can be summed up as an interest in business and an understanding of the wider environment in which an organisation operates: its customers and competitors. For corporates, this is about establishing “competitive advantage”, and it’s often interesting to work out how companies enter new markets (especially the BRIC emerging economies), and what barriers there might be for companies competing effectively in critical markets.

Commercial awareness generally means an understanding of a client’s business and the industry or sector in which it operates. It is a key competency for applicants. It involves not only keeping up to date with commercial issues and it is also about being able to demonstrate commercial awareness through any business/work experience and, specifically, the applicant’s understanding of the type of firm to which they are applying. Clients seek business solutions, presented in a way that makes sense. An understanding that a law firm operates in a competitive industry is also considered as being commercially aware.

As a result you may be expected to demonstrate an understanding as to how the firm markets itself to its clients. To know who the firm’s main competitors are. To explain how you would attract a potential client by explaining the unique selling points of the firm. For example, if you’re applying to a foreign firm, it’s not inconceivable you could be asked who the major players are in that particular market (e.g. the US market). In addition to this you will be expected to know about the practice areas in which the firm or chambers operate and to be aware of key changes in legislation and the economic market which may affect the way in which they operate.

Have you done a LL.M. in international commercial law where you might have gained important experience in drafting or case analysis in this particular field of law? A LL.M. can teach you a lot of basic international corporate law, practical drafting and commercial research case analysis skills. Have you even done a M.B.A. where you have studied business management in great detail? You could also think about participating in any student societies where you are doing the GDL or LPC – these are very active the vast majority of “learning providers”.

Mention any business/commercial experience you have had, including non-legal work and/or roles which involve dealing with clients or members of the public. Have you ever been a Director of a private limited company yourself? This can highlight your awareness of customer needs and expectations. Were you ever given the task of improving a current service or product? Did you add value to it? If so, how did you go about it, what factors did you have to take into consideration? Are you able to identify the long term and short term goals of an organisation or a project? Thinking in terms of a SWOT (the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of the firm or legal sector, or PESTEL, can be helpful.

Did you have a key role in any society committees at school or university? Were you given a financial role? Any of these can be good indicators that you have had to think about different perspectives in the market place.

Have you ever raised money for a charity, secured sponsorship for a key event? What process did you go through to secure the funds? ?Read the business press regularly. Try to know something about current leading stories/issues, and how they might have an impact on the firm’s clients. Look out for stories that will affect the firm to which you are applying, or its clients, directly or indirectly.

Look at the BBC news and business website. Read also publications like the Financial Times, the Economist, and The Lawyer. There are business related programmes on BBC Radio which are also available to listen again on-line and as podcasts such as:

The Bottom Line (with @EvanHD) http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/bottomline  “Insight into business from the people at the top. Evan Davis meets influential business leaders for a round table conversation about the issues that matter to their companies and their customers.”

www.lawcareers.net/Information/BurningQuestion/Introduction.aspx

http://targetjobs.co.uk/law-solicitors/articleview-48s_20a_2733.aspx

www.wikijob.co.uk

www.guardian.co.uk/business

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law

www.realworldmagazine.com/law

www.thelawyer.com

www.legalweek.com

www.lawyer2B.com

Proactivity

 Describe an occasion when you spotted an opportunity to make an improvement in ‘going the extra mile’, and took action without being asked to do so. What steps did you take? What was the outcome? Explain why you think this attribute is relevant for a solicitor.

This question is testing your problem solving ability. Detail what the issue was, why it was difficult and then what you did to resolve it. If you are talking about a group activity, do not put ‘we’ – they are interested in what you did. As with all your answers use this question to differentiate yourself i.e. make it personal and substantiate what you say with specific examples.

Aspects of a good answer might be as follows.

  • Use initiative to act on opportunities. Become a leader before other people view you as one. Healthy organisations often reward those who take the lead, not just those with formal management roles.
  • Take responsibility for own objectives: set priorities. Display a “can do” attitude even in demanding situations. Try to solve problems, rather than to pass them on to other people.
  • Go the extra mile” when asked to do tasks. Go beyond your job description. Do work that gets you noticed. Show enthusiasm: this will be noticed and you will eventually be rewarded.
  • Take ownership of problems: anticipate potential problems, take pre-emptive action and act quickly to resolve problems. Develop innovative practices. Value innovative thinking.
  • Learn new skills that will enhance capability.

 Flexibility

Describe a time that you have had to change your approach to a project or task halfway through. What changes did you have to make? Why did you need to make these changes? What was the outcome?

This means that you are able to modify your approach to achieve a goal, and you are open to change and new information; you can rapidly adapt to new information, changing conditions, or unexpected obstacles. Legal recuiters are often looking for the following aspects.

1. Values need for flexibility:

  • Accepts that other people’s points of view are reasonable or valid.
  • Acknowledges that people are entitled to their opinions, and accepts that they are different.
  • Steps into colleagues’ tasks when needed or required.

2. Demonstrates flexibility:

  • Works creatively within standard procedures to fit a specific situation.
  • Understands policies and can work within them to meet office, work group, team or individual goals.

3. Adapts approach:

  • Changes one’s approach as required to achieve intended outcomes.
  • Prioritises actions effectively in order to respond to numerous, diverse challenges and demands.

4. Adapts strategy:

  • Changes the overall service plan and implements new practices when original approach and assumptions are no longer valid.
  • Able to shift strategic focus and activities quickly in response to changing organizational priorities.

Teamwork

Teamwork is considered crucial to functioning well as a trainee/junior in a corporate law firm.

 Please give an example of a situation where you were required to work in a team to accomplish an important objective and describe your role in achieving this objective

A law student who is good at teamwork might:

  • Believe that working together with others or in teams gives higher synergies to self and the teams, and therefore is positive and enthusiastic about teamwork and team building.
  • Contributes significantly when working as a member of a team or when working as a team leader to build a strong team; respects all the members of the team and cooperates with every team member and the team leader.
  • Provides help and support to those team members who are in need of help and support, and shares relevant knowledge and information with all the team members including the team leader.
  • Maintains the required level of communication in terms of quality, quantity and timeliness with the team members and the team leader.
  • When working as a team leader, facilitates developing team goals with team members’ participation.
  • Motivates the team members while working as a leader of the team or even when working as a member of the team, building up high team morale; creates a sense or feeling of cohesiveness among the fellow members.
  • Is good at resolving the conflicts that might arise due to diverse personalities of various team members.
  • When the members seem to err from the shared mission, goals and priorities, brings them back on the desired focus.
  • Seeks for each and every member’s active and enthusiastic participation all the time and accordingly motivates the members who seem to be getting disinterested or tuned out from time to time.
  • Makes every member feel that each one’s work or contribution is equally important.
  • Shares credit for success of team with all the others in the team.
  • Celebrates the team’s success together with all the others in the team.
  • Makes sure that the various teams do not become islands in themselves and form unnecessary boundaries around them.

Defining qualities of the candidate

What can you tell us about yourself that sets you apart from other applicants, and which are convincing reasons why we should recruit you?

In a sense, your answer to this question is to some extent governed by your personal qualities not covered elsewhere in the form. Here are some further competences which might be relevant here.

Integrity

A trainee will be expected to upholds the principles of the current SRA Code of Conduct. Some aspects might include:

  • Holds to a laudable value structure all the time and in all the situations.
  • Practices integrity while dealing with everyone and therefore is regarded as trustworthy person.
  • Does not turn and twist the information to gain something or to score a point in an underhand manner.
  • Uses confidential information confidentially. Does not divulge the confidential information even under any body’s pressure.
  • Does not indulge in any kind of corruption or corrupt practices.
  • Motivates others to practice integrity by being an example to others.

Leadership

Some aspects might include:

  • Can envision the advancement and growth opportunities.
  • Possesses abilities for high degree of conceptualization, strategizing and analysis.
  • Demonstrates high achievement orientation. Therefore, emphasizes commitment, accountability, action orientation and results.
  • Adept at interpersonal relationships and puts emotional intelligence in action.
  • Excellent communicator.
  • Uses his excellent influencing skills for bringing out the desired consensus, decisions and actions.
  • Very good at decision making processes and once decisions are reached, displays firmness and decisiveness in implementation.
  • Displays required flexibility and adaptability in different situations and times.
  • Is great team builder and team player. Provides necessary support and cooperativeness.
  • Possesses high commercial awareness and business acumen.
  • Develops many next line leaders.

[There are other competences discussed in this factsheet which might be relevant to this question as well.]

Communication skills

 All solicitors at [X] work with a wide range of people so need to be able to persuade, influence and display effective communication skills. Describe a situation when you have had to communicate effectively.

You should think of various forms of effective communications, e.g. oral presentations, written papers, written papers, drafting, interviewing or advising (on the LPC), practical legal research (on the LPC), blogging, participating in podcasts, and how you have adapted your method of communication according to the target audience. Your answer is bound to be more compelling if you can give concrete examples. Some related specific competences are given as below.

Persuasion

One scenario where persuading skills can be important is the job interview, but the following tips are valuable in many other settings.

  • Focus on the needs of the other party. Take time to listen to them carefully and find out about their interests and expectations. This shows that you are really interested in them and they are then more likely to trust and respect you. It will also make it easier for you to outline the benefits of your proposal in terms they understand.
  • Argue your case with logic. Do careful research on your ideas and those of your competitors (if there are any) and make sure that any claims you make can be verified.
  • Use positive rather than negative language: instead of saying “You’re wrong about this”, say “That’s true but ….”, “That’s an excellent idea, but if we look more deeply …..” or “I agree with what you say but have you considered ….”.

Listening

 Some aspects might include:

  • Believes that listening strengthens the quality of communication, interpersonal relations, human relations, emotional intelligence, conflict management and team management.
  • Every interaction requires one to respond and since the quality of response depends on the quality of listening, tries to improve quality of his listening constantly.
  • Thus, listens to understand the other person and not just to react, reply, control or manipulate the other person. By understanding the other person properly, can respond or act in the best possible manner.
  • Generally respects other people and demonstrates openness and trust through his body language and spoken words.
  • Then, paves way to influencing the people in right directions by diagnosing the issues and concerns of others in a better way for effective problem solving.
  • Promotes a more participative style of managing by involving people.

Conflict and pressure

The success of [X] is built on the self-motivation and applied effort of all its employees, as demonstrated by their ability to work through setbacks coping effectively with conflict and pressure. Describe a situation when you have had to deal with conflict and pressure. Which other people involved? What did you learn about yourself?

Some aspects might include the observations that the law student:

  • Recognises the fact that conflicts are quite natural in any organization and yet these need appropriate redressing to move on with apt solutions, thereforeis willing to take up the responsibility of managing and resolving the conflict.
  • Can think through clearly in a conflicting situation.
  • Keeps his eyes constantly on the desired goals and therefore, does not drift away from them despite conflicting arguments and points of views.
  • Listens well and patiently all the conflicting arguments and presentations.
  • Controls the people and their communication patterns in the discussions that takes place when resolving a conflict.
  • Facilitates the innovative and creative thinking of the people caught up in the conflict.
  • Does not take sides of any particular set of people or their thinking. Rather, tries to facilitate working out genuinely appropriate and optimal solutions.
  • Contributes his own inputs, ideas, creativity and analysis to supplement the missing or erroneous information and thus uncover the real issues and reasons that led to the conflict. Then proceeds to help find the answers.
  • Gains agreements without leaving behind any bitter taste or disrupting the human relationships.
  • Is proactive and as far as possible anticipates the conflicting situations and dissolves them well before they turn into conflicts.

Commitment to excellence

 Describe an occasion when you have demonstrated commitment to a task or project that resulted in you exceeding expectations either for yourself or others. What steps did you take? What was the outcome?

You will be able to achieve the excellence in any skill or competency only if you rehearse or practice the learned skill a large number of times. Knowledge alone is no guarantee for achieving great levels in skills or competencies. For example, only if you start swimming, you will become a swimmer; mere knowledge of swimming or great theories of swimming will not automatically make you even an ordinary swimmer. Knowledge surely helps and is a must but without doing, it is of no use to you. Implementation of knowledge is the name of the game. Wisdom is in knowing what to do and how to do but the virtue is doing it.

It’s said that you should become both consciously and unconsciously competent in your strive for excellence. Consciously competent means gaining the knowledge about the skill to be mastered and begin practicing the knowledge gained (example: gaining knowledge on how to swim using proper styles of swimming and start swimming using the right styles of swimming). On the other hand, unconsciously competent means keep practicing the knowledge gained till you gain mastery in the skill (example: you have now become an expert swimmer since you have been swimming using the proper styles of swimming over number of hours and you can now give yourself 9 on 10 or even 10 on 10). For greater success in life, you should try to reach the unconsciously competent level in the skills required by you for your professional, personal, family and social activities/tasks/projects.

Personal challenge

 Describe a significant challenge that you have faced outside of your academic studies ideally from the last 2 years. How did you initially analyse the challenge? What approach did you take to solving it? What did you learn from this challenge?

Successful answers to these sorts of questions need to be as concrete as possible. Supply specific detail on the situation, the actions taken and the results achieved. Figures can be particularly useful in this context.Your example need not be “big”. Go for something you genuinely believe to be a real achievement rather than give them something you think they want to hear – it’ll be more convincing. The important thing is to set it in context. Explain why it was significant to you – if you’re unsporty, uncoordinated and broke your leg six months previously, learning to stay upright while sliding a few hundred metres downhill may well have been a major achievement. A useful device is the Trojan horse technique, which allows you to smuggle in other examples as in “ I considered selecting one of several achievements, including x and y. However I have chosen z because…….”

 Aspects of a convincing answer might include the following.

1. Recognises Lack of Success:

Acknowledges areas where expectations are not met, and provides reasons which may or may not involve self.

2. Remains Positive:

Re-energises after loss or failure or after encountering a significant hurdle to readdress the situation and to overcome it; approaches new situations with continuing positive outlook, despite previous disappointments.

3. Takes Responsibility:

Acknowledges personal responsibility for outcomes, even when not all elements of a situation are within direct control but could have been personally managed.

4. Learns from Mistakes and Successes:

Analyses situations on an ongoing basis to improve own performance; designs a personal action plan to address own issues constructively and decisively.

5. Shares Learning with Team:

Deals openly with failure by bringing team together to define specific problems and present solutions; may involve team in diagnosis and in developing solutions to effectively transfer knowledge into the organisation.

Mitigating circumstances

Are there any important mitigating circumstances why you feel the exam results you have listed do not fully reflect your abilities?

There may be good reasons why you ‘underperformed’, due to recent bereavement, or illness and disease, and these should be set out with reference to documentary evidence where possible.

 

The online application form for vacation placements and training contracts



 

A list of questions below were based on the current questions being used by the following firms on their online application forms: Ashford, Baker & McKenzie, Bird and Bird, Burges Salmon, CMS Cameron McKenna, Dechert, Dewey and LeBoeuf, Holman Fenwick Willan, K & L Gates, Kennedys, Mischon de Reya, Macfarlanes, Norton Rose, Olswang, Osborne Clarke, and Paul Hastings.

[X] has minimum academic requirements, so before completing our application form please give careful consideration to the following questions:

1 Do you have 3 A levels at grades A, B, B or equivalent? (N.B. Taken in one sitting and NOT including General Studies.

2 Have you gained or are you realistically expecting to gain a minimum 2.1 honours degree or equivalent?

3 Have you previously made an unsuccessful application to [X]?

Languages

4 Multiple languages can be added by selecting the language, and selecting fluency levels.

Education

5 [Percentage grades are now required for undergraduate and postgraduate subject results. You are required to ensure that your institution details and results are correct. You must include at least one secondary and one undergraduate record (including all results). You are also obliged to provide a complete breakdown of all your grades by subject, obtained  during secondary school and university. Please list your all of your GCSEs and A' Levels or international equivalent.]

How did you hear about us?

6 [Various options are given.]

Referees

7 [You are normally required to enter details of two employers at least, sometimes one academic and one vocational.]

Other details

8 Excluding motor offences not resulting in a custodial sentence or disqualification from driving, have you ever had a criminal conviction (including any spent conviction which, by virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Exceptions) Order 1975, should be disclosed)?

9 Do you have any disability for which you require any assistance for during the selection process?

Work experience

10 [You are normally required to set out details of your work experience (usually 4 + “others”).]

Competence questions

Activities, interests, positions of responsibility

11 Please give brief details of your key non-academic extra-curricular hobbies, activities, leisure interests, highlighting any positions of responsibility whether at school, university or otherwise.

12 Describe your biggest achievement and/or most demanding position of responsibility you have held to date; why did this achievement stand out for you, and what did you learn from this?

Prizes

13 Please provide details of any academic prizes, distinctions, skills, scholarships and any other noteworthy achievements. In the case of skills please specify level of proficiency

Firm specification

14 Please explain why you think you are well suited to [], and have chosen to apply to [] for a training contract or vacation scheme placement? why you think you would make a successful trainee?

15 [X] is a leading UK law firm. How do you think we are distinct from other law firms?

16 All [X] trainee solicitors are based in our [Y] office. Please give your reasons for choosing to live in or around and train at the [Y] office.

Career motivation

17 What qualities do you think you possess to be a successful lawyer at [X]? Which areas of law interest you and why?

18 Please explain what attracts you to a career as a solicitor at an international business law firm, with reference to other careers that you might have considered and why you chose not to pursue them.

Commercial awareness

19 Identify a current commercial article that you read or a recent event from the business world which has attracted your attention recently. Why do you consider it to be significant? Who are the key stakeholders in this situation and what are the implications for those concerned?

20 Business acumen and commercial awareness are important elements to becoming a successful solicitor. Please outline, in your opinion, why you think this would be important and tell us about a time when you’ve demonstrated your abilities in this area. What was the occasion and what impact did possessing this awareness have over the final outcome?

21 Choose a sector group of the firm and summarise the biggest challenges and opportunities they will face in the future.

Proactivity

22 Describe an occasion when you spotted an opportunity to make an improvement in ‘going the extra mile’, and took action without being asked to do so. What steps did you take? What was the outcome? Explain why you think this attribute is relevant for a solicitor

Flexibility

23 Describe a time that you have had to change your approach to a project or task halfway through. What changes did you have to make? Why did you need to make these changes? What was the outcome?

Teamwork

24 Please give an example of a situation where you were required to work in a team to accomplish an important objective and describe your role in achieving this objective

Defining qualities of the candidate

25 What can you tell us about yourself that sets you apart from other applicants, and which are convincing reasons why we should recruit you?

Communication skills

27 All solicitors at [X] work with a wide range of people so need to be able to persuade, influence and display effective communication skills. Describe a situation when you have had to communicate effectively.

Conflict and pressure

26 The success of [X] is built on the self-motivation and applied effort of all its employees, as demonstrated by their ability to work through setbacks coping effectively with conflict and pressure. Describe a situation when you have had to deal with conflict and pressure. Which other people involved? What did you learn about yourself?

Commitment to excellence

27 Describe an occasion when you have demonstrated commitment to a task or project that resulted in you exceeding expectations either for yourself or others. What steps did you take? What was the outcome?

Gap year

28 If you have taken any gap years, please provide details of work/activities undertaken.

Personal challenge

29 Describe a significant challenge that you have faced outside of your academic studies ideally from the last 2  years. How did you initially analyse the challenge? What approach did you take to solving it? What did you learn from this challenge?

Mitigating circumstances

30 Are there any important mitigating circumstances why you feel the exam results you have listed do not fully reflect your abilities?

Additional information

31 If applicable, please state any additional information which you think is relevant and supportive to your application or which you think has not been covered adequately in this form

 

We are due to do a meeting on this at 5.30 pm in room 2.4 BPP Law School Holborn for all current members of BPP. Our handout can be downloaded here:  BPP Legal Awareness Society handout on the online application form

A free systematic way to prepare for the online verbal reasoning test for training contract applications



To be frank, you are most likely to have to sit an online verbal reasoning test at some stage in an application to a corporate firm for a training contract. Even if  you  manage to escape one at the time of submission of your online application form, you are likely to have to do one as a precursor to an interview, or part of an assessment day. You might even have to do two online verbal reasoning tests; one in your time, and one ‘under exam conditions’. It’s probably fair to say that the test will be administered on behalf of the corporate firm by SHL or Kenexa; this test has a ‘true’, ‘false’ or ‘cannot say’ format. Some, including one Magic Circle firm, have used the Watson-Glaser Critical Reasoning Test, which you are likely to do in the head office of that corporate firm instead. Here is a suggested route from ‘Legal Recruit’, an initiative by students in the BPP Legal Awareness Society, but it’s important to note that this training is not a product of BPP, nor endorsed by BPP. We hope, in our Society, hope that you find these free materials helpful, anyway.

Introductory video to an online verbal reasoning test

Factsheet on the online verbal reasoning test

Examples of questions of a verbal reasoning test

150 examples of verbal reasoning test questions

A free full-length practice verbal reasoning test for you to try [you can only do this if you are a graduate and speak English fluently.]

Answers to the trial (only to look at if you’ve done the trial)

 

Best of luck! We hope it goes well for you.

Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech