Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech

Home » Posts tagged 'crisis leadership'

Tag Archives: crisis leadership

How not to lead in a crisis: Jeremy Hunt and A&E



Jeremy Hunt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earlier this week the King’s Fund warned that waiting times for A&E patients had hit a nine-year high and the number of people waiting more than four hours to see a doctor had almost doubled since last year.

Jeremy Hunt is supposed to be the “leader” in the “A&E crisis“, having just been recruited to implement a £3bn reorganisation of the NHS which, historically, has been opposed by all the Medical Royal Colleges.

Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who won a third term, and is widely regarded as an adept city leader, but came under fire for inefficient snow removal in New York City. Most of the complaints came from residents in the so-called outer boroughs — e.g., the four that are not Manhattan. However, Newark Mayor Cory Booker has received acclaim for his response to his snowfall, despite accepting criticism on a host of other matters.

Some failures can be useful if leaders learn from them, according to Robert Mittelstaedt, Dean of Arizona State University’s business school. The three biggest causes of failures he sees are not believing data, disregarding new phenomena, and not taking responsibility for problems. Hurricane Katrina holds plenty of those lessons, according to Mittelstaedt. He points out that for years a wealth of information was available that New Orleans could not withstand a major storm, but officials didn’t act on the data. Officials then ignored information about the scope of suffering by those stranded in the city. He blamed President Bush and others for not taking responsibility and instead arguing about whose job it was to rescue people. “When you see people on rooftops, you don’t sit around worrying about whose responsibility it is,” according to Mittelstaedt.

Erika Hayes James, an organisational psychologist at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business,categorises five phases of crisis that require specific crisis leadership competencies in “smoldering crises. Smoldering crises differ from sudden crises in that they begin as minor internal issues that, due to manager’s negligence, develop to crisis status. These are situations when leaders are blamed for the crisis and its subsequent effect on the institution in question.  Each phase contains an obstacle that a leader must overcome to improve the structure and operations of an organisation. James’s case study on crisis in the financial services sector, for example, explores why crisis events erode public trust in leadership. James’s research demonstrates how leadership competencies of integrity, positive intent, capability, mutual respect, and transparency impact upon the trust-building process.

John Baldoni (2011) in the Harvard Business Review views that important lessons can be derived from how a ‘good leader responds to a crisis’.

    • Take a moment to figure out what’s going on. The problem is that everything under the sun has been blamed for the crisis, apart from the current operations management of this Coalition, by Jeremy Hunt. Reasons cited by Hunt have included winter, “The UK Labour Party”, immigrants, women GPs, and targets. To compound the farce which has been “the blame game”, Stephen Dorrell, the Tory chair of the health select committee, very publicly disagreed with Hunt recently, over linking the crisis in A&E departments to GPs opting out of working nights and weekends.
    • Act promptly, not hurriedly. A leader must provide direction and respond to the situation in a timely fashion, but acting hurriedly only makes people nervous. However, it is really in dispute whether Hunt in fact acted promptly. According to Jamie Reed MP, a recent Freedom of Information request submitted to the Department of Health shows that Jeremy Hunt had spent six months as Health Secretary before visiting his first A&E unit. When he finally got around to it, the A&E unit he visited was only yards from his own office.
    • Manage expectations. When trouble strikes, people want it to be over right now — but seldom is this kind of quick resolution possible. It falls to the leader in charge to address the size and scope of the crisis. You don’t want to alarm people, yet do not be afraid to speak to the magnitude of the situation. Winston Churchill was a master at summing up challenges but offering a response at the same time. As he famously stated in 1940, when assuming office, he said,”You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory; victory at all costs; victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival.” However, the plan proposed by Hunt is neither decisive or prompt. He has announced a fundamental review of emergency care, conceding that “we have failed to give the public confidence that there’s anything between GP surgeries and A&E”. The review, which will result in action by next April, will focus on “vulnerable older people”, whom Hunt said were the heaviest users of the NHS. However, at least the review will not be a panicked response.
    • Demonstrate control. When things are happening quickly, no one may have control, but a leader can assume control. That is, you do not control the disaster — be it man- made or natural — but you can control the response. This is a man-made crisis. Unfortunately, there’s an element that Hunt is still in denial over this crisis, with him having only a few hours ago tweeted:

Jeremy Hunt tweet

And above all Jeremy Hunt has offended the first rule of crisis leadership: he has not taken responsibility for the crisis personally, nor vicariously on behalf of the current government.

If I could subpoena Cameron and Clegg to do a leaders' debate now, I would



If I could subpoena Cameron and Clegg to do a leaders’ debate now, I most definitely would. As a student of a MBA course going at a very fast rate, it is easy to get a feel for a flavour of the management and leadership styles of David Cameron, and to understand why he personally, and his Tory-led government, are doing catastrophically badly. I exclude Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats, whose ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ opportunity to transform the nature of politics on the left-wing has been utterly wasted. Nobody sane would expect Nick Clegg to face the music in a Leaders’ debate in 2015, for example.

The issue with the Tory-led government is that they have a sole core competency, that is to reduce the deficit. However, the mechanism by which they are doing it is causing considerable damage to the recovery which had started in the first few months of  their current (and probably) last term of government. By having no coherent policy for generating growth, they potentially could worsen the deficit by decreasing tax receipts and increasing benefit spending. It’s like having a credit card when you’re unemployed, but you are sanctioned from having any source of income.

David Cameron also fails as a leader in a number of textbook ways. As a potential transformational leader, he does not have the support of key followers essential for a  change management to succeed, say in the public sector. Essential in this change management is not doing the change too fast, and having some symbols of success. Instead, David Cameron faces increasing waiting times and a plethora of equally disastrous metrics in NHS management, and the ultimate accolade in manufacturing output, the GDP, is deterioriating all the time. His preferred management style for running the public sector is ‘lean management’, which runs two grave dangers. Firstly, it can be extremely difficult to do a root cause analysis of problems when things go wrong, and secondly there is little functional slack. Take for example the recent riots. In an overstretched, underfunded, police service, it is difficult for the police and justice system to mount a satisfactory response. Amazingly, they have, but despite a dangerous level of cuts.

David Cameron has equally proven himself as a poor crisis leader. Over the riots, where he was accused of spending too long in Tuscany, and over the hacking crisis, where the evidence provided by Goodman, Coulson and Murdoch continues to cause problems, Cameron has been seen naked in responding way too late after the events; and again he suffers from a lack of trust by his followers, the UK general public.

Furthermore, in textbook terms, David Cameron fails as a charismatic leader. This was first identified really by Mary Liddell who wondered some time ago whether the general public could grow to embrace David Cameron. Indeed, Liddell was right. They couldn’t. The result was a hung parliament, with a completely ineffective Nick Clegg, driven by a personal dislike of Gordon Brown and ‘liberal principles’, led his party at Westminster to vote against EMA and the rise in tuition fees. No wonder his political party was slaughtered in the local elections.

So, I do come back to my basic thought: if I could subpoena Cameron and Clegg to do a leaders’ debate now, I would. Tragically, the country is stuck with them until 2015.

Please vote for http://www.shibleyrahman.com in the Total Politics Blog Awards 2011.

Click to listen highlighted text! Powered By GSpeech