Home » Posts tagged 'BSF'
Tag Archives: BSF
Cameron's Big Society is nearly dead.
Laura Kuenssberg tried to trip Ed Miliband with her pathetic little trick of saying that Labour had no plans about deficit reduction. Her message is simply a disgusting lie. Labour said it would not have cut the deficit as fast or as deep. Ed’s answer below couldn’t possibly be clearer. And on Laura Kuenssberg’s head be it when growth grinds to a total halt, unemployment shoots up and we still have no growth strategy (and the people in collusion with her such as George Osborne and David Cameron). The reason the public aren’t impressed because Nat Wei has left the Big Society as its Big Architect – maybe this fits in better with his work schedules with McKinsey’s, if he’s still working there, assuming of course any companies he works for do not have ongoing contracts with the Big Society. And it is a sham – as legal professionals may not be able to volunteer for community legal centres because of an annual cut to legal aid of the order of £2bn a year, in schools because of the illegal scrapping of BSF, or in SureStart centres because they’re being scrapped. A disaster – a contemptible one at that.
Andy Burnham's letter to David Cameron about BSF (Building Schools for the Future")
Rt Hon David Cameron MP
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
14th February 2011
Dear Prime Minister,
High Court ruling on Building Schools for the Future
On Friday, the High Court ruled that the Education Secretary’s decisions on Building Schools for the Future constituted an ‘abuse of power’.
I am sure you will agree that this is an extremely serious charge to be made against a member of your Cabinet.
The Secretary of State’s decisions were found to be ‘unlawful’ in respect of six councils on the Building Schools for the Future programme.
The Judge also ordered that the decisions affecting these councils be reconsidered with “an open mind”.
From his response to the ruling, the councils concerned will find it hard to believe that the Secretary of State’s mind is anything other than firmly made up. At no point has he acknowledged the defectiveness of his original decision-making process. He appears to have pre-judged any review of the decisions by so robustly defending his original actions.
Given that questions also remain over whether he ignored the advice of lawyers and civil servants in pressing ahead without consultation, there are serious doubts over whether the public could have any confidence in a review of the decision by this Secretary of State.
These matters affect the hopes of communities and the life chances of children across the country. To restore the confidence of the six councils in this case that they will receive a fair hearing, I urge you to remove the Secretary of State from any further role in the review process.
Best Wishes
RT HON ANDY BURNHAM MP
Shadow Secretary of State for Education
